<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for British Open: HDTV or not?</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/07/17/british-open-hdtv-or-not/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for British Open: HDTV or not?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on British Open: HDTV or not?]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/07/17/british-open-hdtv-or-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/07/17/british-open-hdtv-or-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[Did they get 567i from BBC? or 480i?<br><br>Not sure it makes a huge difference, but 87 more lines can't hurt!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 17th 2005 9:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on British Open: HDTV or not?]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/07/17/british-open-hdtv-or-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/07/17/british-open-hdtv-or-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[Andy, we're not sure because we haven't found any additional information. This explains why every golfer was precisely three-inches shorter on the HD feed, however. ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2005 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on British Open: HDTV or not?]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/07/17/british-open-hdtv-or-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/07/17/british-open-hdtv-or-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[I sincerely hope that it was 480i, as you would have to frame-rate convert (standards convert) the 25Hz 576i to show in the US, and that would mess up the picture quality a lot more. The BBC know what they are doing, though why they didn't provide a full HD feed is a mystery - probably too expensive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2005 10:20AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>