<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for SBC tags set-top box companies for IPTV</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/08/18/sbc-tags-set-top-box-companies-for-iptv/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for SBC tags set-top box companies for IPTV</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SBC tags set-top box companies for IPTV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/08/18/sbc-tags-set-top-box-companies-for-iptv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/08/18/sbc-tags-set-top-box-companies-for-iptv/</guid><description><![CDATA[More competition in the TV-distribution arena is a great thing. So is moving toward a video-on-demand world. But I find it less than ideal to have the same entities controlling both the pipes and the content options, especially given recent FCC rulings that lessen broadband competition. (The SBCs of the world are less vertically integrated than the Time Warners, at least.)<br><br>I look forward to a day when TV (a TV-internet hybrid, actually) offers a range of voices comparable to what you find on the web, and that expanded universe becomes as easily available as CBS or NBC.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Sande]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2005 9:00PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
