<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Coax making a comeback?</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/09/14/coax-making-a-comeback/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Coax making a comeback?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Coax making a comeback?]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/09/14/coax-making-a-comeback/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/09/14/coax-making-a-comeback/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually quite a bit more than 40 channels if the video was compressed in MPEG4 (like DirectTV plans to do).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2005 7:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Coax making a comeback?]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/09/14/coax-making-a-comeback/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/09/14/coax-making-a-comeback/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's true. My example is for uncompressed HDTV. With MPEG-2 or MPEG-4, you could fit much more programming "in the pipe."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2005 7:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Coax making a comeback?]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/09/14/coax-making-a-comeback/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/09/14/coax-making-a-comeback/</guid><description><![CDATA[HD-SDI is carried over a "lowly coaxial cable" with bitrates of around 1.5Gbps.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 15th 2005 3:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Coax making a comeback?]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/09/14/coax-making-a-comeback/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/09/14/coax-making-a-comeback/</guid><description><![CDATA[An HD signal at 19.2 Mbps IS compressed with MPEG-2.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cecil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 15th 2005 3:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Coax making a comeback?]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/09/14/coax-making-a-comeback/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/09/14/coax-making-a-comeback/</guid><description><![CDATA[My bad (again) Cecil! For some reason I had 8-VSB modulation on the brain when I was writing and responding. I completely forgot the other half of the current HDTV equation = MPEG-2. HDTV is a two part transmission: modulation AND compression. Thanks for the catch! <br><br>I'm surprised nobody caught my other faux pas: I wrote 19.2 Mbps when in fact, it would be more accurate to say 19.39 Mbps for an HD stream. ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2005 2:09PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>