<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Four eyes needed: one for each HDTV program</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/20/four-eyes-needed-one-for-each-hdtv-program/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Four eyes needed: one for each HDTV program</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Four eyes needed: one for each HDTV program]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/20/four-eyes-needed-one-for-each-hdtv-program/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/20/four-eyes-needed-one-for-each-hdtv-program/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder what that throughput would have to be in MPEG-4, since high-def requires 9Mbs in that.  I guess roughly half then (duh).  But if its 4 times the res, that would only make a Mpeg-4 stream of this ultra-def content 36Mbs.<br><br>Really the only application at this res would be huge displays, at a certain point I think the eye couldn't tell on smaller displays, and by smaller, I'm thinkin 50".  I always thought that thing at the beginning of total recall was cool, sitting at the breakfast table and having it look like you had an awesome view of somewhere else.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cecil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 20th 2005 10:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Four eyes needed: one for each HDTV program]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/20/four-eyes-needed-one-for-each-hdtv-program/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/20/four-eyes-needed-one-for-each-hdtv-program/</guid><description><![CDATA[Okay, that picture completely freaks me out. It reminds me of those magic eye things that were popular back in the mid-90s!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Varghese]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 20th 2005 10:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Four eyes needed: one for each HDTV program]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/20/four-eyes-needed-one-for-each-hdtv-program/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/20/four-eyes-needed-one-for-each-hdtv-program/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow James, good thing we didn't go with the animated .gif that I was originally planning!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 20th 2005 11:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Four eyes needed: one for each HDTV program]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/20/four-eyes-needed-one-for-each-hdtv-program/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/20/four-eyes-needed-one-for-each-hdtv-program/</guid><description><![CDATA[If the prcing really is $10,000 dollars, it would definitely make a great computer display, especially for video editing as you could view a full-res hdvpreview, or two quite high res hd previews.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2005 4:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Four eyes needed: one for each HDTV program]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/20/four-eyes-needed-one-for-each-hdtv-program/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/20/four-eyes-needed-one-for-each-hdtv-program/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pshaw.  2160i?  I'm a real videophile, wake me up when they release 2160p like they should have in the first place.  $@#%!ing QHDTV Group.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheMatt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 20th 2005 1:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Four eyes needed: one for each HDTV program]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/20/four-eyes-needed-one-for-each-hdtv-program/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/20/four-eyes-needed-one-for-each-hdtv-program/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ummmm... 1.4GBps is a lot more than four times 19.2Mbps.  By those calculations, MPEG-4 video at 2160i would be about 600Mbps, though I suspect good quality compression would get it a little lower.  If they could somehow convert 2160i signal into 4 different 1080i signals on the fly and get them synched, then you might be able to do it under 50Mbps.<br><br>Just for reference -- Sony's 4K digital cinema projectors can display 4096 x 2160 in movie theaters.  I wrote last week about the possibility of showing live TV events at that resolution in theaters, actually...<br><br>http://www.permanent4.com/2005/10/desperation-at-dodecaplex-v-who-needs.html<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Permanent4]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 20th 2005 3:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Four eyes needed: one for each HDTV program]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/20/four-eyes-needed-one-for-each-hdtv-program/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/20/four-eyes-needed-one-for-each-hdtv-program/</guid><description><![CDATA[One benefit of 2160p screens is that they can easily scale both 720p (x3) and 1080i/p (x2) material.<br><br>So you do not need to worry about 2160p source material. Plus they would be amazing for a PC games.<br><br>Anyone want to lend me $10,000???? I setle for £7,000 :-)!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RockySpieler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 29th 2005 9:09PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>