very nice compilation.
It sounds here as if progressive would be better for fast motion than interlaced. However with fast motion the number of "picture events" per second is what determines the smoothness of the motion. With the same bandwidth available an interlaced format variation will record twice as many instances than it's progressive counterpart.
Sorry, you must login or register to leave a comment!
“It's rare if a month flies by without some random university or DIYer proclaiming that the next major jump in battery technology is just over the horizon.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
very nice compilation.
It sounds here as if progressive would be better for fast motion than interlaced. However with fast motion the number of "picture events" per second is what determines the smoothness of the motion. With the same bandwidth available an interlaced format variation will record twice as many instances than it's progressive counterpart.