<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Sony's SXRD 4K projector</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Sony's SXRD 4K projector</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's SXRD 4K projector]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe you can ask for a permanent review sample.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Henning Hoffmann]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 25th 2005 12:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's SXRD 4K projector]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why is this device called the "4K" projector when it has a resolution of 8 million pixels? If it's because it has four "times" the resolution of 1080p, shouldn't it be called "4X"?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ergin Guney]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 25th 2005 1:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's SXRD 4K projector]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</guid><description><![CDATA[4000 horizontal pixels is where they got the name from apparently.  http://www.igrid2005.org/media/press_09.26.05_cinema.html<br><br>man, I wish I could get my hands on one, ha, every 1080p set would suddenly only get a half a star in each review, they just wouldn't compare. I wonder how good the scaler is at upconverting SD content tho....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 25th 2005 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's SXRD 4K projector]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</guid><description><![CDATA[:)<br><br>If you're watching SD on this thing, you need help.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Henning Hoffmann]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 25th 2005 3:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's SXRD 4K projector]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</guid><description><![CDATA[Live pictures from the sea floor would have been more entertaining than last night's game.  If it weren't for Warrick Dunn, that game would have been COMPLETELY unwatchable.  Michael Vick will never be more than a sideshow until he stops running all the time.<br><br>The 4K projectors are actually designed for digital cinema, where that kind of resolution can make a big difference.  We have a local cinema here that shows Monday Night Football games on a 35-foot screen, but they project an SDTV image from a cable box -- VERY fuzzy -- and they're not willing to upgrade until some digital cinema standards are finalized.  I think it's a waste.  Even HD resolution through that 4K projector would probably look pretty good on a large movie screen...<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Permanent4]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 25th 2005 4:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's SXRD 4K projector]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you watched the game, the whole reason dunn had so much room to run, was because the linebackers were all looking for vick on the bootleg.  You can think vick is a good qb or not all you want, but the falcons will continue winning with him under center, and not winning without him under center.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 25th 2005 5:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's SXRD 4K projector]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</guid><description><![CDATA[How can it be 4 times HD?<br>1920x1080 times 4 = 7680x4320<br>1920x1080 times 2 = 3840x2160<br><br>So it shoulde be more like dubble the HD-quality or what am I missing?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 26th 2005 9:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's SXRD 4K projector]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</guid><description><![CDATA[Jimmy, here's a diagram to explain.<br>  __<br> |__| = 1920x1080<br>  __ __<br> |__|__| = 4096x2160<br> |__|__|<br><br>See, 4 times the screen area.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 6th 2005 7:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's SXRD 4K projector]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/25/sonys-sxrd-4k-projector/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah 4 times the screen AREA, not the resolution!?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 26th 2005 3:01PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>