Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm looking for a solid state drive, around 32 to 64GB, for use in my web server. The drive will contain my web sites and the operating system, either Windows Server 2008 R2 or Ubuntu. Large storage is handled by a separate RAID array, so capacity is not an issue. Rather, I am looking for the fastest, longest-lasting, and most reliable drive under $150 that is suitable to my application. Any thoughts? Thanks!"
I don't understand why you or anyone else cares about whether a TV uses wobulation or not. What do you care if the TV looks the same as a non-wobulated set? You wouldn't even be able to tell the difference. If you have a car that performs perfectly would you care that it does so with a turbocharger, or naturally aspirated? No.
The proofs in the performance, you should not care how it does it as long as its reliable...which it is.
And no one should be surprised as HP invented wobulation, and has been in the DLP business (projectors) for a while now. And thats not even taking into account the good reviews in Oct. Sound and Vision and on AVS forums. The only sets out there that can run with the HP are the Qualia and the Sony SXRD. The Qualia is $13,000 and only marginally better. The SXRD is similarly priced and may even have a slightly better picture but will not take a 1080p signal over HDMI which does not matter a lot right now but will be a crippling feature for many over the next few years thanks to home theater PCs, playstation 3, external video scalers and possibly Blue Ray.