<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for HD Beat Review: Harmony 659</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for HD Beat Review: Harmony 659</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Harmony 659]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</guid><description><![CDATA[The problem I'm having is I have LG HD Tuner with a DVD which I use to watch DVDs, a Panasonic DVR which I can't program with the 659.  It's not easy to set up!<br><br>The bottom line is, "my wife won't touch the thing", and I bought it for her.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Hatle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2005 9:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Harmony 659]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</guid><description><![CDATA[Coincidentally I setup my 659 yesterday.  It did everything I expected and more.<br><br>The most impressive thing that I still can't figure out is when you tell it what Satellite/Cable service you use, you select which channels you get, and behond the freaking programming listings show up right on the remote!  All you do is press teh harmony button, you can select favorites out of the hundreds of channels yuo do get and instead of fiddling with the slow satellite you can breeze through the listing on the remote.<br><br>Not bad for an entry level Harmony.  I want the 850 now ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 29th 2005 9:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Harmony 659]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great review, makes me want one..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[freestufftimes.com]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 29th 2005 7:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Harmony 659]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have the 680.  All of the Harmony 6 series remotes are basically the same.  They just have varying numbers of buttons and different layout.<br><br>Personally, I feel that the 680 has the best button layout for a DVR.  The 659's FFWD/REW/Pause/play buttons are just too low on the remote to use as often as you do with a DVR.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 29th 2005 11:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Harmony 659]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</guid><description><![CDATA[At the 04 digital life - the Harmony guys (not the logitech folks). Made an interesting note. The 659 is one of thier best remotes and the release of the 676 sovlved one important issue - the typical stop/rec/play buttons are moved up so that you can use the DVRs without having to reposition your hand. I would have bought either one but after figuring that out.. i went with the remote that would handle dvr a little easier on the hand. Not sure what else is different.  <br><br>Im addicted to my harmony.. I think i like it better than my other much more expensive components...<br>Cheers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[William P.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Harmony 659]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh and the upcoming 690 (with rf capabilities) will have an optional usb rf device (plugged to a computer) that will auto update all the programing info directly to your remote (throught the remotes rf!) .. <br><br>So Tim.. Start saving up now.. THat thing will be expensive but should be amazing!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[William P.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2005 12:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Harmony 659]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</guid><description><![CDATA[i've got the h-655 (EU model, exactly like 659 but the color of some buttons) and just love it. also harmony support is the best i've ever encountered. on three separate occasions they were able to fix problems in less than a day!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chuck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2005 5:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Harmony 659]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice and well done review.  Even though I only have 3 remotes it does give me something to think about.  Thanks for the information.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 31st 2005 10:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Harmony 659]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice review. I have the Harmony 880 and I love it. It controls every component (both new and old) I own.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sMoRTy71]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 31st 2005 10:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Harmony 659]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</guid><description><![CDATA[How can it be called a "universal" remote without track forward/back buttons (not to mention "quick skip/instant replay" buttons)?  How am I expected to control my DVD player or PVR?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Prest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 31st 2005 10:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Harmony 659]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</guid><description><![CDATA[The top LCD screen can be programed for anything button you want. If you want to add the quick skip foward, then it will appear there on the "watch TV" activity. Good question and I should have put that in the full review.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Burns]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 31st 2005 11:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Harmony 659]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have the 676 with the detachable faceplates :) .. Love it. I had an earlier version that wasn't as great as it broke when i dropped it a few times.<br><br>The newer remotes seem more durable. I noticed the just released the new 880: http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/products/detailsharmony/US/EN,CRID=2084,CONTENTID=9933<br><br>that looks nice too...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guido]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 31st 2005 5:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Harmony 659]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</guid><description><![CDATA[I got mine back before Logitech took over, so there weren't many to choose from. I did a lot of research and this one was the best all round. I got mine for $99 online somewhere (sorry, it's been a while). My wife complained that it took her 30 minutes to figure out how to watch TV once when I was not home. TV, receiver, cable box, input, input, input, etc...<br><br>The best is not only being able to have it set up before you get it in the mail (if you order it) but that it works the best. And LCD buttons suck, because we surf by braile. LCD you have to look down at the remote and aim for the button location. The nice thing about the Harmony's LCD buttons is that the button is not LCD, but next to it.<br><br>And the last but never least is the WF (Wife Factor). My wife has been telling people to get this remote (the married women).<br><br>This is a true Universal Remote. No more pressing a button before using a volume, back to a button to change channels. This is the one remote (any one of the Harmony remotes) to rule them all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 31st 2005 11:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Harmony 659]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/10/29/hd-beat-review-harmony-659/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess these are outdated compared to the Harmony ones, but I sure love the HomeTheaterMaster remotes.  They're pretty tough to find but lots of hard buttons, easy to program, and a screen that makes sense.  I find TiVo buttons line up fairly well.  The WAF is high!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 1st 2005 1:13AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>