<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for HDTV in mainstream media: NYT gets it wrong, St. Paul Pioneer Press gets it right</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/12/10/hdtv-in-mainstream-media-nyt-gets-it-wrong/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for HDTV in mainstream media: NYT gets it wrong, St. Paul Pioneer Press gets it right</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDTV in mainstream media: NYT gets it wrong, St. Paul Pioneer Press gets it right]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/12/10/hdtv-in-mainstream-media-nyt-gets-it-wrong/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/12/10/hdtv-in-mainstream-media-nyt-gets-it-wrong/</guid><description><![CDATA[I also read the above article he didn't say CRT isn't HDTV he said that it old technolgy. Personally you have to take into account NY times reader aren't your everyday Joe Blow(NY Post,Daily News) Times reader will probably opt for newer products before others.Article is definately slanted but actually incorrect.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[derrick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2005 6:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDTV in mainstream media: NYT gets it wrong, St. Paul Pioneer Press gets it right]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/12/10/hdtv-in-mainstream-media-nyt-gets-it-wrong/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/12/10/hdtv-in-mainstream-media-nyt-gets-it-wrong/</guid><description><![CDATA[Um, if we are going to get on our high horse about spreading misinformation, you’re also going to have to drop your “1024x768 isn’t real HDTV” campaign.  Nowhere on the ATSC website nor on the federal government's DTV website is there a regulation regarding horizontal resolution in the HDTV standard. Now, for a 16:9 screen it's easy to do the math and come up with 1280x720 or 1920x1080 assuming square pixels, but, again, nowhere on the government's website can I find a reference to this. I can't find any reference to square pixels, either. The only reference I've found so far is defining vertical resolution.  <br><br>The feds ONLY define HDTV by vertical lines of resolution, with 720 being the minimum.  Therefore, 42" plasmas with 1024x768 resolution can be said to fit the HDTV standard, even though one could argue that a 42" screen with 1280x720 resolution might give you a superior picture.<br><br>I am not arguing as to whether higher pixel density or square pixels are advantageous for a good picture -- I've been an advocate of square pixels since the first Macintosh computer came out, and I do believe that higher pixel densities=better picture.<br><br>SMPTE does refer to resolutions of 1280x720 and 1920x1080 in their standard. However, this is not echoed in the ATSC standard.  The reason this is significant is because SMPTE is a trade organization. They can set standards, but they are not legally binding. If the feds set a standard, then that is legally binding. <br><br>In fact, the ATSC standard, there is a reference to SMPTE and other trade standards that explicitly states that they are not required by the ATSC standard.  In Section 9, Possible Video Inputs, it says:<br><br>========<br>9. POSSIBLE VIDEO INPUTS<br>While not required by this standard, there are certain television production standards, shown in Table A1, that define video formats that relate to compression formats specified by this standard.<br><br>Table A1 Standardized Video Input Formats<br><br>Video Standard Active Lines Active Samples/ Line<br>SMPTE 274M 1080 1920<br>SMPTE 296M 720 1280<br>ITU-R BT.601-4 483 720<br><br>The compression formats may be derived from one or more appropriate video input formats. It may be anticipated that additional video production standards will be developed in the future that extend the number of possible input formats.<br>========<br><br>This section acknowledges the presence of external standards that are not required by the feds at this point in time. I think this is the loophole that allows an HDTV with a resolution of 1024x768 to be sold as an HDTV.  Whether you think that is an HDTV worth buying is a separate issue.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilbur Pan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2005 6:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDTV in mainstream media: NYT gets it wrong, St. Paul Pioneer Press gets it right]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/12/10/hdtv-in-mainstream-media-nyt-gets-it-wrong/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/12/10/hdtv-in-mainstream-media-nyt-gets-it-wrong/</guid><description><![CDATA[I do agree, a CRT definatly makes a better picture than LCD, DLP, plasma and projection TVs. There's a Circuit City right next to where I work and, at times I stop in for what's up. Those flat TVs are nice for less space but you got to be directly in front of the sets or you loose brightness, contrast, color. Standing close to them, they are totaly unimpressive. Projecting an image on 'smoked' glass (plastic?) is poor and grainy. You still see a screendoor effect on many of them, and the picture's not really that big. They say the burn-out is rather quick too, (though I've never seen the comparison of lifetime hours with CRTs). They don't have as fast a response as CRT, thus the 'ghosting'. I would prefer an HDTV CRT but I don't see them ever being very big for a while, if ever. I'd take the 'bulky tube' HDTV sooner than the flat screens any day. Our SDTV 36" CRT didn't blow yet (after 10 years), and we also use an SXGA projector making a 120" picture (could you imaging the price of a plasma screen at that size?) for our DVDs. I hope CRTs will be around for more than 20 years!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray Morris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2005 10:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDTV in mainstream media: NYT gets it wrong, St. Paul Pioneer Press gets it right]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2005/12/10/hdtv-in-mainstream-media-nyt-gets-it-wrong/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2005/12/10/hdtv-in-mainstream-media-nyt-gets-it-wrong/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really think this is terrible. I see a time in our future were if you're not "in the know" about the new technologies, you're completely lost. I work at the library and I help people with simple tasks on the computer like using Microsoft Word and browsing on the internet. It really doesnt help the consumer if the information that we recieve is bad, half-true, or completely false. So many people fall into the traps of  salesmen at retail electronic stores because they aren't well informed. Sad times]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Isewise]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2005 11:39PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>