I read Philip's statement on the matter and I am confused. It sounds as if they are saying that the physical screen is capable of displaying 1080p but that there is no way to get a 1080p signal to the screen and there is no way for the display to create a 1080p signal inside the set. If that is what they are saying then how can they call them 1080p sets. This is completely stupid. So who else makes a "1080p" set that can't output a 1080p signal?
What about the Westinghouse 37inch and 42inch sets and the Sharp Aquos 45 inchers?
“Measuring 21.5 inches each, with 1920 x 1080 resolution, 1,000:1 contrast ratio, and optical multitouch technology under their chunky bezels, these two models represent the biggest mainstream push for touchscreen computing yet.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I read Philip's statement on the matter and I am confused. It sounds as if they are saying that the physical screen is capable of displaying 1080p but that there is no way to get a 1080p signal to the screen and there is no way for the display to create a 1080p signal inside the set. If that is what they are saying then how can they call them 1080p sets. This is completely stupid. So who else makes a "1080p" set that can't output a 1080p signal?
What about the Westinghouse 37inch and 42inch sets and the Sharp Aquos 45 inchers?