<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for CES: Blu-Ray players</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/ces-blu-ray-players/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for CES: Blu-Ray players</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CES: Blu-Ray players]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/ces-blu-ray-players/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/ces-blu-ray-players/</guid><description><![CDATA[1080p and DTS-HD - Just add their new 1080p plasma with the latest 7.1 audio system. That's what I'm talking about! (We do have this little issue called price though...)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2006 5:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CES: Blu-Ray players]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/ces-blu-ray-players/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/ces-blu-ray-players/</guid><description><![CDATA[According to Sony's new president, PS3 must debut at $399 and if they must delay six months to bring it in at that price, then they will delay six months. I expect the real reason behind the delay was to give their partners an early adopter window when they could charge $1000 and up for one. Although I'm not sure how well that strategy will work with Toshiba's $499 HD-DVD player dropping in March.<br><br><br><br>Natiahs]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[natiahs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2006 5:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CES: Blu-Ray players]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/ces-blu-ray-players/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/ces-blu-ray-players/</guid><description><![CDATA[I seriously don't get how sony is going to sell the ps3 affordably. We all know they don't make much if any off the system, but if the ps3 sells for under 500 bucks noone will buy a standalone blu-ray player. Maybe thats their plan, I dunno, but its confusing to me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[freestufftimes.com]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2006 5:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CES: Blu-Ray players]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/ces-blu-ray-players/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/ces-blu-ray-players/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's easy to see how Sony plans on sell the the PS3 as an affordable BluRay player, just look at the PS2 for clues.  <br><br><br><br>Everyone spoke of the PS2 as a trojan horse for DVD, but I had a standalone DVD player (Panasonic A-105) prior to purchasing my PS2.  I bought the PS2 on release day, took it home and got to compare it to my existing DVD player.  Guess what?  It sucked as a DVD player; no remote, crappy menus, and you really noticed when a layer changed.  Video wasn't as clean as the Panasonic, I noticed a few artifacts.  Granted this was early in the PS2 life and I've heard the later versions are much better, but the point is that your $299 bought you a good game system, but a sub-par dvd player.<br><br><br><br>I'm expecting the PS3 to follow a similar path, providing a sub-par Blu-Ray experience compared to conventional set-tops, and being a gaming console first.  It is a PlayStation afterall.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EdwardA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2006 2:04PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
