<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for No HD Super Bowl if your local affiliate and cable company can&#039;t agree</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/01/18/no-hd-super-bowl-if-your-local-affiliate-and-cable-company-cant/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for No HD Super Bowl if your local affiliate and cable company can&#039;t agree</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on No HD Super Bowl if your local affiliate and cable company can&#039;t agree]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/01/18/no-hd-super-bowl-if-your-local-affiliate-and-cable-company-cant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/01/18/no-hd-super-bowl-if-your-local-affiliate-and-cable-company-cant/</guid><description><![CDATA[the deal was only reached with insight and wide open west in columbus. the rest of us on time warner still get the shaft.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[monkeypox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 18th 2006 5:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on No HD Super Bowl if your local affiliate and cable company can&#039;t agree]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/01/18/no-hd-super-bowl-if-your-local-affiliate-and-cable-company-cant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/01/18/no-hd-super-bowl-if-your-local-affiliate-and-cable-company-cant/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've been meaning to get around to a letter writing campain towards the advertisers on Sinclair's stations here in Columbus. <br><br>I doubt I'll even watch the super bowl. At least the tennis US Open was in HD on CBS which I can get.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zelig2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 18th 2006 6:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on No HD Super Bowl if your local affiliate and cable company can&#039;t agree]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/01/18/no-hd-super-bowl-if-your-local-affiliate-and-cable-company-cant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/01/18/no-hd-super-bowl-if-your-local-affiliate-and-cable-company-cant/</guid><description><![CDATA[I live in Greensboro and have been watching Sinclair's WXLV for several years in High Definition - for FREE!.  They have one of the best HD signals in the market.  To get HD on cable (if Sinclair and Time Warner made nice), it would cost me close to $70 a month.<br><br>All the press articles takes the cable company's view.  As an early adoptor - RCA DTC100 HD Receiver, I was watching HD long before the cable company even offered it. (I bought the receiver on eBay.)  To read the articles, it would make you think that you could not watch a Free Over-The-Air television signal.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Moore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 18th 2006 10:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on No HD Super Bowl if your local affiliate and cable company can&#039;t agree]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/01/18/no-hd-super-bowl-if-your-local-affiliate-and-cable-company-cant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/01/18/no-hd-super-bowl-if-your-local-affiliate-and-cable-company-cant/</guid><description><![CDATA[The sinclair group is screwing us in Saint Louis too... The only reason I use my OTA ATSC tuner is so I can get ABC over HD.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kurt htuchinson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 19th 2006 11:39AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>