<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Terrestrial Digital antenna blends performance with style</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/02/21/terrestrial-digital-antenna-blends-performance-with-style/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Terrestrial Digital antenna blends performance with style</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Terrestrial Digital antenna blends performance with style]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/02/21/terrestrial-digital-antenna-blends-performance-with-style/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/02/21/terrestrial-digital-antenna-blends-performance-with-style/</guid><description><![CDATA[UHF only.  Ain't gonna work in Chicago.  Still need an ugly monstrosity here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Buzzcut]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2006 11:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Terrestrial Digital antenna blends performance with style]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/02/21/terrestrial-digital-antenna-blends-performance-with-style/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/02/21/terrestrial-digital-antenna-blends-performance-with-style/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder why the antenna industry refuses to admit that the FCC now allows VHF DTV broadcasts.  They are still hawking their UHF only antennas as HDTV specific antennas, and they are not.<br><br>Also, note the promo pictures orientation, suggests it has something to do with satelite reception, instead of vertical and looking like some form of "slab".  Interesting.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin VanMeter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2006 11:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Terrestrial Digital antenna blends performance with style]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/02/21/terrestrial-digital-antenna-blends-performance-with-style/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/02/21/terrestrial-digital-antenna-blends-performance-with-style/</guid><description><![CDATA[Terk may make nice looking antennas, but they don't work worth a crap.  The best antennas are those that build upon  100 years of antenna technology. If you're buying an antenna because it's 'HDTV' rated, you're buying nothing but marketing.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2006 11:36AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>