<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for What if the DRM on your DVD player didn't work?</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/02/22/what-if-the-drm-on-your-dvd-player-didnt-work/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for What if the DRM on your DVD player didn't work?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on What if the DRM on your DVD player didn't work?]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/02/22/what-if-the-drm-on-your-dvd-player-didnt-work/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/02/22/what-if-the-drm-on-your-dvd-player-didnt-work/</guid><description><![CDATA[The funny thing is that I never would have even thought of hacking my DVD-HD841 player until I saw a press release yesterday that said it was easy to do. Last night I went home and tried it out and had the thing all fixed up in about 5 minutes. It even plays DiVx movies now, which is great considering I almost bought another player a few weeks ago just for that purpose.<br><br>If they'd just kept their mouths shut, normally law-abiding citizens like me wouldn't have even thought about it. Now that it's out in the open I consider it fair game!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2006 4:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on What if the DRM on your DVD player didn't work?]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/02/22/what-if-the-drm-on-your-dvd-player-didnt-work/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/02/22/what-if-the-drm-on-your-dvd-player-didnt-work/</guid><description><![CDATA[Am I missing something about DRM?<br><br>For example, It's pretty computationally expensive to demand that the chips that handle video-processing (for things like dynamic shutters in projectors, white-balance, etc) operate on encrypted image data.  It'd be a huge calculation overhead for every corrected pixel, especially for antialiasing techniques, since that would be multiple decryptions per antialiased pixel.<br><br>Much cheaper to decrypt and use a "clear" signal for processing, since a clear signal can be put through current video-processing hardware.<br><br>But as soon as you have a clear signal, someone can intercept it and bypass all the downstream copyright/DRM measures. (HDMI, MACROVISION, etc)<br><br>There will always be someone willing to break out the soldering iron and syphon clear signals off the PC board.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Crosius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2006 5:08PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>