<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for News Corp thinks you&#039;ll pay $30 per flick for on demand HD</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for News Corp thinks you&#039;ll pay $30 per flick for on demand HD</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on News Corp thinks you&#039;ll pay $30 per flick for on demand HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, for $30 I can rent a movie and have nothing to show for it? Sign me up, I simply can't wait through another month for the high def DVD. Plus I have all this money I don't want. Here, take some.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jellodyne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 2nd 2006 3:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on News Corp thinks you&#039;ll pay $30 per flick for on demand HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Chernin is high.  Expect to see some job openings in the market research department at News Corp.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DLP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 2nd 2006 3:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on News Corp thinks you&#039;ll pay $30 per flick for on demand HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cocaine is a terrible drug. And when you're sucking it back like candy like this dude it's catastrophic. If I pay $30 for a movie I expect the hooker to come with it. Honestly how do these guys keep their job. He should be fired. Straight up.<br>Piracy is looking like the only sane option now, and that's just sad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mcloki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 2nd 2006 3:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on News Corp thinks you&#039;ll pay $30 per flick for on demand HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok, they are neither Stupid or Stoned, they just live in New York City... (granted, this can have a similar effect...) but they just have no concept of the real world out here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CEC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 2nd 2006 4:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on News Corp thinks you&#039;ll pay $30 per flick for on demand HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would pay $25 for a movie that was released simultaniously with the Theater version. I already pay $16 for my wife and I to go to the movie. If I could sit on my couch and watch the latest movie in HD I'd definitly pay $25. Hollywood won't allow it though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wiggin78]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 2nd 2006 5:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on News Corp thinks you&#039;ll pay $30 per flick for on demand HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Some times I feel like an alien in this world.<br>What do they teach in economics classes these days, or most diplomas are bought on the internet? It seems very simple to me. Broadband 4th quarter 2005 made the most DSL subscribers, why? Simple $14.95 a month. Wal-Mart the richest company in the world, why? Simple, affordable products. China makes more money selling toys then Russia ever dreamed of making selling weapons. Itunes 99 cents a song you like to listen to thus 1 billion sold so far as apposed to $15 a cd with one hit wonder. Why spend so much time money and effort on DRM, make it affordable piracy minimized to a miniscule. Conclusion, make it affordable more people will buy. <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[specnaz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 2nd 2006 8:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on News Corp thinks you&#039;ll pay $30 per flick for on demand HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[hahaha<br><br><br>um no way at all<br><br>$30 to own it sure.  To view it even for a 30 day pass?  NO WAY<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 2nd 2006 10:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on News Corp thinks you&#039;ll pay $30 per flick for on demand HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[GAWD, these guys are typical arrogrant american corporate management! DUMB AS DIRT!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dna]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2006 9:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on News Corp thinks you&#039;ll pay $30 per flick for on demand HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[yes, they're on crack. but what they're really trying to do is build the loss of dvd sales into the 'on demand' price. they must be assuming that the same person who will pay $30 for a movie will also download that movie to their computer and burn themselves and their friends copies. and for $30, they'd be right.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2006 12:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on News Corp thinks you&#039;ll pay $30 per flick for on demand HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/02/news-corp-thinks-youll-pay-30-per-flick-for-high-definition-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[DirecTV needs some new marketing folks.  This on top of their move to a leasing-model where you have to pay big bucks up front for the privilege to lease receivers from DirecTV shows that they are wildly out of touch with reality.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2006 2:34PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
