http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/03/lcd-vs-plasma-rages-on/ Engadget Comments for LCD vs Plasma rages on http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/03/lcd-vs-plasma-rages-on/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/03/lcd-vs-plasma-rages-on/
This could be because of the signal, I wont rule that out. I do like the PQ of plasma but I do like a 1080P screen for my HTPC.

Of course things change and SED could be the new thing. Right now for TV viewing I like plasmas.]]>Mar 3rd 2006 7:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/03/lcd-vs-plasma-rages-on/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/03/lcd-vs-plasma-rages-on/]]>Mar 3rd 2006 9:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/03/lcd-vs-plasma-rages-on/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/03/lcd-vs-plasma-rages-on/
give me hd resolution, give me size, give me good prices, and i'll buy it. 26" Aquos for $1150 (USD) equals *much* love.]]>Mar 4th 2006 12:07AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/03/lcd-vs-plasma-rages-on/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/03/lcd-vs-plasma-rages-on/Mar 6th 2006 10:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/03/lcd-vs-plasma-rages-on/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/03/lcd-vs-plasma-rages-on/
I've seen Plasmas and LCDs in the store, and they both look amazing. I'm not saying there isn't a difference (because there is). All I'm saying is that it really isn't worth all of the shoe pounding that goes on.

I just really want to know when SEDs will be coming and how much they will be. Until then I will put up with my old rear projected, burned in Panny that still looks pretty damn good :)]]>Mar 6th 2006 11:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/03/lcd-vs-plasma-rages-on/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/03/lcd-vs-plasma-rages-on/
There can be glare issues with plasma - we live on the west side of Manhattan by the river so we get a lot of light but this does not make anything unwatchable and it is really only bright sunlight directly reflecting off a back wall that you notice.

With respect to burn in, our nanny leaves the plasma on TWC music channels for a few hours daily which means that I have a static image on screen for many hours a day every day. Absolutley no signs of burn in. I guess I could get here to turn off the plasma and just leave the receiver on but with no burn in and the 60,0000 hours to half brightness, why bother?

With LCD blacks being grey, that is mitigated in a well lit room so for the most part this is not an issue. Unless you like watching in a darkened room which I know a lot of ppl do.

The biggest issue is still response time because the specs that manufacturers give out are still grey to grey so you are not getting real world response times.

I'm going to stick with plasma until SED comes out in >50" size and then prolly jump to that. ]]>Mar 6th 2006 4:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/03/lcd-vs-plasma-rages-on/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/03/lcd-vs-plasma-rages-on/> How fast does the LCD need to be to catch up to the plasmas?

At 60 frames per second (i.e., 1000 milliseconds), a new frame is displayed every 16 2/3 milliseconds. No need to go any faster than that.]]>Mar 15th 2006 1:13PM