<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Toshiba&#039;s new et20 HD projector</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/03/13/toshibas-new-et20-hd-projector/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Toshiba&#039;s new et20 HD projector</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Toshiba&#039;s new et20 HD projector]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/03/13/toshibas-new-et20-hd-projector/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/03/13/toshibas-new-et20-hd-projector/</guid><description><![CDATA[This seems like a poorly thought out idea to me.  If you've to got the time and recources to setup a dedicated room in which you can properly view a projected HD picture, why would you be buying an "all-in-one" device?  The DVD I can understand, as it would be difficult to get a signal to the projector by running cables, etc.  But I don't understand the 5.1.  Plus, it looks like it was made in 1978 to me.  Not to be harsh, but it all seems so obvious to me...  Anyone else?  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MadcapMagician]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2006 5:20PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>