<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for DisplayPort: Because what we really needed was another connector</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/05/03/displayport-because-what-we-really-needed-was-another-connector/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for DisplayPort: Because what we really needed was another connector</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DisplayPort: Because what we really needed was another connector]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/05/03/displayport-because-what-we-really-needed-was-another-connector/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/05/03/displayport-because-what-we-really-needed-was-another-connector/</guid><description><![CDATA[A lack of licensing fees is a big deal in emerging or state run markets.  While I don't imagine seeing it popping up in the US anytime soon, this is the kind of thing that will take off in Asia, like VCD.<br>So, a better question, when will we see a consistent standard?  My HDMI is already out of date, but I'm not jumping at the chance to get UDI equipment.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EdwardA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2006 6:30PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>