http://hd.engadget.com/2006/05/09/wii-is-high-def-more-important-then-content/ Engadget HD Comments for Wii: Is high-def more important then content? http://hd.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://hd.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/05/09/wii-is-high-def-more-important-then-content/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/05/09/wii-is-high-def-more-important-then-content/May 9th 2006 12:18PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2006/05/09/wii-is-high-def-more-important-then-content/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/05/09/wii-is-high-def-more-important-then-content/
I think $250 or $300 for a Wii will kick the crap out of the other two because that's all I'm willing to spend on a game console, and I make a good living.]]>May 9th 2006 12:44PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2006/05/09/wii-is-high-def-more-important-then-content/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/05/09/wii-is-high-def-more-important-then-content/
I pick the later... after spending $3000k on a plasma, another extra $200 for an HD capable mutimedia platform is worth it.

People don't want HD consoles for the games, they want HD capability so that they have something other then a cablebox to deliver HD content. In two years Nintendo will be regretting the lack of HD support.

]]>May 9th 2006 1:37PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2006/05/09/wii-is-high-def-more-important-then-content/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/05/09/wii-is-high-def-more-important-then-content/May 9th 2006 2:28PM