<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Pioneer's Blu-ray player officially delayed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/06/pioneer-blu-ray-player-offically-delayed/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Pioneer's Blu-ray player officially delayed</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer's Blu-ray player officially delayed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/06/pioneer-blu-ray-player-offically-delayed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/06/pioneer-blu-ray-player-offically-delayed/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is turning into a Catch-22, isn't it? No content since no player. No player since no content. Someone needs to start sending email to these idiots and let them know they bought their competition's equipment because of their lazy behinds stalling until the third coming of Fat Bastard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GhostDoggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 6th 2006 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer's Blu-ray player officially delayed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/06/pioneer-blu-ray-player-offically-delayed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/06/pioneer-blu-ray-player-offically-delayed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, I am hoping Pioneer wants ANY Elite model (even the 1st gen BR player) to be up to the usually great standards they have for Elite gear.<br><br>Imagine if the Elite was buggy, sluggish, and just a lame duck - that would not be good for their reputation.<br><br>BTW, I don't work for or own any Pioneer gear, just my take on why it is being delayed ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 6th 2006 2:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer's Blu-ray player officially delayed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/06/pioneer-blu-ray-player-offically-delayed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/06/pioneer-blu-ray-player-offically-delayed/</guid><description><![CDATA[My choice for these next gen HD movie players will all depend on who provides me with a 1080p player first. If someone can release a HD-DVD player that outputs true 1080p then I will be very happy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2006 2:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer's Blu-ray player officially delayed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/06/pioneer-blu-ray-player-offically-delayed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/06/pioneer-blu-ray-player-offically-delayed/</guid><description><![CDATA[The earliest 1080p HD DVD player won't come for several months.  They haven't even announced plans for one.  All Blu-ray players will include 1080p output.  There's 4 announced for between now and early November (Samsung, Sony, Pioneer, and Panasonic), and rumors are that there are at least 9 brands, some with more than 1 model, expected by year's end.  Even better, a couple should be priced competitively with the low-end Toshiba ($500-$600).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zombieflanders]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2006 12:07PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
