<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Brazil chooses ISDB for their digital broadcasts</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/06/30/brazil-chooses-isdb-for-their-digital-broadcasts/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Brazil chooses ISDB for their digital broadcasts</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Brazil chooses ISDB for their digital broadcasts]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/06/30/brazil-chooses-isdb-for-their-digital-broadcasts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/06/30/brazil-chooses-isdb-for-their-digital-broadcasts/</guid><description><![CDATA[What is "cost"? Is it patent licensing?  Is it channel bandwidth requirements? Is it processing power?<br><br>I'm trying to think of other things that could drive up cost in chosing a broadcast TV standard.  I don't think it would be processing power at least ont he reciever if it works on cell phones.  <br><br>It's too bad that we didn't just come up with a standard of broadcasting over IP, and essentially have standardized file or stream formats, and then convert digital TV to large network broadcast media.  Then our TVs would essentially be reciving a digital file and displaying it, and it wouldn't matter if it was getting it over the air or over an RF cable, or over some other IP network.<br><br>IP Everywhere!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[William C Bonner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 30th 2006 2:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Brazil chooses ISDB for their digital broadcasts]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/06/30/brazil-chooses-isdb-for-their-digital-broadcasts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/06/30/brazil-chooses-isdb-for-their-digital-broadcasts/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cost is royalties, some of which Japan has agreed to waive, and (I guess) processing power. Brazil will have to subsidize mass-production of ISDB set top boxes, which they may not have to do if they went with ATSC or DVB.<br><br>Each station will get an extra 6 MHz chunk to broadcast digital TV. They have to use that entire 6 MHz or forfeit it completely. São Paulo, Rio, and Brasilia will start by then end of 2007. Then other state capitols, then smaller cities, then repeaters until July 2016 when the government takes analog back. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HDjanitor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 30th 2006 8:29PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>