<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for AT&T's U-verse adds WealthTV</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/07/29/atandts-u-verse-adds-wealthtv/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for AT&T's U-verse adds WealthTV</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&T's U-verse adds WealthTV]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/07/29/atandts-u-verse-adds-wealthtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/07/29/atandts-u-verse-adds-wealthtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[WealthHD is complete shit. It's a bunch of absoloutly insipid and dull shows about $10,000 lamps and $300,000 end tables. It's one of the most bizarre and pointless channels I've seen in a long time. Unless you're a millionaire it's guaranteed to offend you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 29th 2006 10:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&T's U-verse adds WealthTV]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/07/29/atandts-u-verse-adds-wealthtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/07/29/atandts-u-verse-adds-wealthtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Has anyone seen/heard if these fiber to the home type services offer an improved HD picture/audio quality by compressing less? I know the bandwidth should in theory allow for a less compressed picture, but are these companies making the effor to get the most out of the bandwidth as far as the HD and HD VOD services go? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott K]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2006 3:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&T's U-verse adds WealthTV]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/07/29/atandts-u-verse-adds-wealthtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/07/29/atandts-u-verse-adds-wealthtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, they add WealthHD and then sell your account information or give it away to the NSA. Read the recently revised AT&T stance on your p[rivate information.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GhostDoggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2006 7:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&T's U-verse adds WealthTV]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/07/29/atandts-u-verse-adds-wealthtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/07/29/atandts-u-verse-adds-wealthtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[WealthTV sucks. Period.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin M.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2006 1:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&T's U-verse adds WealthTV]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/07/29/atandts-u-verse-adds-wealthtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/07/29/atandts-u-verse-adds-wealthtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've been watching Wealth tV for some time on Starstream.  They have a series on Health that is pretty strong.  The Boomer show is also very entertaining.  I haven't seen any $300k end table type stuff on the channel and would'nt be interested.  Show me a $300k car and it's a different story. They define wealth in a broader sense not necessarily money.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Woods]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 24th 2006 4:14PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>