Even at 160 Mbps, downloading a 25GB HiDef movie would take about 30 minutes. That's peak speeds over the line (users would also have to make sure their router is Gb capable or they'll be limited to 100Mbps). Better than Netflix yes. I'm guessing maybe they'll implement a buffer where you can begin watching as the movie is downloaded.
Hmm, if the cable companies can really get 100+ Mbps and offer a $30-40 a month unlimited viewing of HiDef movies then Netflix would be in real trouble. As far as HD-DVD and BluRay, some people still like to have a copy of the movie. Can't see that going away this next gen.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Even at 160 Mbps, downloading a 25GB HiDef movie would take about 30 minutes. That's peak speeds over the line (users would also have to make sure their router is Gb capable or they'll be limited to 100Mbps). Better than Netflix yes. I'm guessing maybe they'll implement a buffer where you can begin watching as the movie is downloaded.
Hmm, if the cable companies can really get 100+ Mbps and offer a $30-40 a month unlimited viewing of HiDef movies then Netflix would be in real trouble. As far as HD-DVD and BluRay, some people still like to have a copy of the movie. Can't see that going away this next gen.