<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for NuVision's 52LEDLP 1080p LED based DLP priced and dated</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for NuVision's 52LEDLP 1080p LED based DLP priced and dated</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NuVision's 52LEDLP 1080p LED based DLP priced and dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[Have there been any reviews of the Samsung anywhere yet?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kagai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2006 9:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NuVision's 52LEDLP 1080p LED based DLP priced and dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA["$4,3199"<br><br>tha,ts an in,teresti,ng pr,ice..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[comma nazi.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2006 9:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NuVision's 52LEDLP 1080p LED based DLP priced and dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[Better double check that 1080p. The article referenced suggested "1366x768 Native resolution". Seems like the Sammy is 1080p, but I'm not sure if it's wobulated or not.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[apacit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2006 11:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NuVision's 52LEDLP 1080p LED based DLP priced and dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[There are no reviews yet.<br><br>The Samsung uses wobulation, and matt if you could please check but I'm pretty sure the HL-S5679W has been pushed back AGAIN!!<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ScootOnDown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2006 3:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NuVision's 52LEDLP 1080p LED based DLP priced and dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[ScootOnDown - Just talked to my Samsung source and they are saying that the unit is indeed shipping. I too am waiting for it as they indicated that they shipped out our review unit on July 26, but you haven't seen a review yet cause I don't have it. I kind of excepted it here by now, but nothing I can do about.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Burns]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2006 4:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NuVision's 52LEDLP 1080p LED based DLP priced and dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[S5679W is out.  Look here:<br><br><a href="http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=709624&page=1&pp=30&highlight=5679W" rel="nofollow">http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=709624&page=1&pp=30&highlight=5679W</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fastman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2006 4:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NuVision's 52LEDLP 1080p LED based DLP priced and dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[$4400 for an Anti-Rainbow DLP rear-projection television? I guess this might be the last-gasp of life for RPTVs. The way that flat-panel prices keep coming down I doubt many family-room oriented solutions will continue to accommodate these monolithic beasts.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GhostDoggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2006 8:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NuVision's 52LEDLP 1080p LED based DLP priced and dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[The NuVision 52" LED-DLP is in fact a full 1080p display, utilizing TI xHD4 1920x1080 chipset. What sets us apart from Samsung is the fact we use Single Red, Green, and Blue LED's in a revolutionary heatsink design. Also unique to NuVision is our DSDB black system- generating a legitimate contrast ratio exceeding 5000:1. LED-DLP offers significant color range reproduction, and lightning fast response time. For the pure videophile- there is not a flat panel technology today that can offer anything close. More details at www.nuvision.com and the correct press release is up at <a href="http://www.hometoys.com/news.php4?section=view&id=13719367" rel="nofollow">http://www.hometoys.com/news.php4?section=view&id=13719367</a><br><br>Cheers!<br>Scott Deley / CEO NuVision]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Deley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2006 1:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NuVision's 52LEDLP 1080p LED based DLP priced and dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/nuvisions-52ledlp-1080p-led-based-dlp-priced-and-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Samsung HL-S5679W has not been released as of August 19, 2006. I am concerned about two things, though. First, the Samsung HL-S5679W received the Best TV award at the 2006 Consumer Electronics Show, because it had amazing specifications that were FAR ahead of the competition. The original specification for the HL-S5679W said that it was 10,000:1 in the area of Contrast Ratio. However, Samsung's website, and almost all of the major sales websites, say that the current Contrast Ratio of the HL-S5679W is 4,000:1 rather than the original 10,000:1 Contrast Ratio. This is very disappointing, because all of the HDTV competitors in this price range have a high-quality Contrast Ratio of 10,000:1.<br><br>Also, the original specification from the 2006 CES said that the HL-S5679W used a 3D Digital Comb Filter. However, the Samsung website and almost all of the major sales websites say that the HL-S5679W now uses a 3-Line Digital Comb Filter, which isn't quite as good as the 3D Digital Comb Filter that was originally supposed to be used in the product. <br><br>Personally, when a TV is as expensive as the HL-S5679W, I would not even consider it unless it had a 10,000:1 Contrast Ratio and a 3D Digital Comb Filter. <br><br>Also, Samsung should give back the awards they received at the CES if they are not going to release a product as good as the one displayed at the CES. Samsung has continually delayed the HL-S5679W, in order to increase its quality. This is the correct decision, but I hope that they are going to release the product with the correct Contrast Ratio of 10,000:1 and the correct form of 3D Digital Comb Filter.<br><br>I truly hope that the final release of the HL-S5679W will have a 10,000:1 Contrast Ratio and a 3D Digital Comb Filter...or else, I will not purchase it. <br><br>If the HL-S5679W does have those features that were originally announced at the 2006 CES, when it won the award for Best TV, I will be the first person to purchase it!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Zoran]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2006 9:57PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
