You kind of missed the whole point about scaling 16:9 images into a 4:3 resolution with odd shaped pixels. I can't think of any High Def material easily available in a 4:3 resolution. Like I said scaling between 1280x720 and 1366x768 is a uniform stretch/shrink. Scaling High Definition sources (all of which are at least 720p) will involve scaling non uniformly to fit into the 4:3 resolution.
Widescreen TV's with a 4:3 resolution are part of what may have led to the death knell of plasma TV's, I'm a Home Cinema installer and I have trouble getting my head around how a 4:3 1024x768 resolution TV fits into the widescreen only High Def camp.
The Galaxy Tab 10.1, much like its Limited Edition sibling that we reviewed last month, is ever-so-slightly thinner than the iPad 2, a slate that most sane individuals (and competitors, for that matter) would confess is the market leader today.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Ben,
You kind of missed the whole point about scaling 16:9 images into a 4:3 resolution with odd shaped pixels. I can't think of any High Def material easily available in a 4:3 resolution. Like I said scaling between 1280x720 and 1366x768 is a uniform stretch/shrink. Scaling High Definition sources (all of which are at least 720p) will involve scaling non uniformly to fit into the 4:3 resolution.
Widescreen TV's with a 4:3 resolution are part of what may have led to the death knell of plasma TV's, I'm a Home Cinema installer and I have trouble getting my head around how a 4:3 1024x768 resolution TV fits into the widescreen only High Def camp.