<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for 52- and 46-inch Sharp 1080p Aquos LCDs US-bound in October</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/31/52-and-46-inch-sharp-1080p-aquos-lcds-u-s-bound-in-october/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for 52- and 46-inch Sharp 1080p Aquos LCDs US-bound in October</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 52- and 46-inch Sharp 1080p Aquos LCDs US-bound in October]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/31/52-and-46-inch-sharp-1080p-aquos-lcds-u-s-bound-in-october/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/31/52-and-46-inch-sharp-1080p-aquos-lcds-u-s-bound-in-october/</guid><description><![CDATA[If the 42inch had HDMI 1.3 i'd be picking it up on its release date. 4ms response times sounds great though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheNatural]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 1:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 52- and 46-inch Sharp 1080p Aquos LCDs US-bound in October]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/31/52-and-46-inch-sharp-1080p-aquos-lcds-u-s-bound-in-october/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/31/52-and-46-inch-sharp-1080p-aquos-lcds-u-s-bound-in-october/</guid><description><![CDATA[Did they really cut the Sony/Samsung response time in half?  Or does the 4ms just represent black to white?<br><br>My "Joe Schmo" math tells me 4ms should eliminate blur.  You figure multiply the 4ms by 4 to get the gray-to-gray number (call it 16ms) and even with 60 frames per second you're a bit under 1000ms.  Heck, this tv might actually be watchable.  That would be a first for an lcd tv.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 2:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 52- and 46-inch Sharp 1080p Aquos LCDs US-bound in October]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/31/52-and-46-inch-sharp-1080p-aquos-lcds-u-s-bound-in-october/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/31/52-and-46-inch-sharp-1080p-aquos-lcds-u-s-bound-in-october/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice. But what happened to the stand? that design is just awful. It looks like thouse cheap 42" Akai Plasmas sold at Wal-mart last holiday.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Perrey Z.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 2:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 52- and 46-inch Sharp 1080p Aquos LCDs US-bound in October]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/31/52-and-46-inch-sharp-1080p-aquos-lcds-u-s-bound-in-october/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/31/52-and-46-inch-sharp-1080p-aquos-lcds-u-s-bound-in-october/</guid><description><![CDATA[How can you spend 3 or 4 grand now on a hdtv, when you know next year hdmi 1.3 is coming ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 6:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 52- and 46-inch Sharp 1080p Aquos LCDs US-bound in October]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/31/52-and-46-inch-sharp-1080p-aquos-lcds-u-s-bound-in-october/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/31/52-and-46-inch-sharp-1080p-aquos-lcds-u-s-bound-in-october/</guid><description><![CDATA[actually, do these sharp have hdmi 1.3?, i doubt it ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 6:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 52- and 46-inch Sharp 1080p Aquos LCDs US-bound in October]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/31/52-and-46-inch-sharp-1080p-aquos-lcds-u-s-bound-in-october/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/31/52-and-46-inch-sharp-1080p-aquos-lcds-u-s-bound-in-october/</guid><description><![CDATA[Perrey: How can you spend 3 or 4 grand on a hdtv next year, when you'll know SED will be coming the year after? There's always some new technology "just around the corner" and you can perpetually make an argment to wait instead of buying.<br><br>Most people who didn't wait for 1080p are perfectly happy with their decision, and will be for some time. I think the case for waiting for HDMI 1.3 is even weaker than that for waiting for 1080p.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ehsan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 7:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 52- and 46-inch Sharp 1080p Aquos LCDs US-bound in October]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/31/52-and-46-inch-sharp-1080p-aquos-lcds-u-s-bound-in-october/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/31/52-and-46-inch-sharp-1080p-aquos-lcds-u-s-bound-in-october/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm eying the 46 inch. If its listed at 3500, you will probably be able to find it on froogle for less than 3 grand. The stand will probably be removable (at least i hope, I thought the line with the built in Piano black finishes were awful) I you cannot remove the speakers, it looks ugly on a wall mount, which is why most people by lcds.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 7th 2006 10:16PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
