<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice. If PS3 supports dual-layer disks, lossless audio, and BD-J features, it will exceed my expectations as a Blu-Ray player.<br><br>Wish the title selection was a litter better, though. <br><br>JET<br><br>PS: How weird is it that Corpse Bride was on the original HD-DVD demo disk but has only been announced for release on Blu-Ray?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Natiahs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 11:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Holy wow.  I was hoping the (far superior) director's cut of "Kingdom of Heaven" was going to come out on Blu-ray some day.  But as an initial release in AVC with lossless sound on a DL disc?<br><br>Awesome.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 11:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[These are ok movies. Speed was a hit but like over a decade ago. Kingdom of Heaven was decent but it's a bit long.  I'm interested to see what Fox can do with BD-J and how many DL movies they can ship. All in all a plus for the "beleaguered" BDA camp. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hmurchison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 11:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[It will be interesting to see if using the MPEG4 Codec will surpass HDDVD in video quality.  I doubt it since their still using single layer 25GB for most of these releases with the exception of Kingdom of Heaven.  I have to say I will believe all this when I see it. It does not good though]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dennis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 11:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Edit for Post 3 - I meant to end it by saying - It does sound good though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dennis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 11:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its about time they started doing blu-ray right.<br><br>Even though i own a very nice two disc extended special edition of Kingdom of Heaven already, i will definitely pick this one up as well, and maybe eBay the other, or hand it off to my sister, who seems to like Orlando Bloom an aweful lot for some reason.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brenden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 11:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow nice!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gora]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 11:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good news indeed.  Hopefully there will be news of more 50Gb MPEG4 disks in the near future.  Still, it's not enough for me to justify getting a standalone player just yet.  Just hope PS3 plays nicely with these disks.<br><br>As for the titles themselves... I like 'Behind Enemy Lines' but would only rent the others... except League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (which is crap).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve J]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 12:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why is it that Blu-ray can't use VC-1, like HD DVD, when it's consistently rated the best compression algorithm, better than MPEG4, or h.264. I just don't get it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Sununu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 12:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm glad the advanced audio codecs and MPEG4 are finally being used, as well as BD-J. I'm afraid I REALLY disagree with the article when it states, though, that they're worth the $40 MSRP.  <br><br>HD-DVD can already have long movies with great PQ (via VC-1), interactivity (iHD), and lossless audio (DTS TrueHD) without being that expensive.  You shouldn't have to pay more for BD to get the equivalent quality of HD-DVD, they should be the same price.<br><br>If the PQ and AQ are at the same level, it makes no sense at all for one format to charge more for software and twice as much for the hardware.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ILJG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 1:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Correction to above, I meant to say "Dolby TrueHD"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ILJG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Blu-ray content providers are hesitant to use VC-1 since MS owns the licensing rights to it. MS is the main supporter of HD-DVD. So they would only be paying thier competitor. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[apoc06]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 2:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice. Much better treatment than most of these crappy movies deserve. Fantastic Four and The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, I'm lookin' at you. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jellodyne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 4:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Kingdom of heaven is the only title in the bunch worth watching and there's no way in hell I'd pay 40 bucks for it. Hell I've watched it in HD twice in the last month on HBO and could record it in HD if it were worthy.... <br><br>This whole format war is pissing me off. I'm not jumping in line for either one. But where the hell does these guys get off raising the near two decade old "standard price" for a movie to $40 just so you can get higher res, slightly improved audio and a bunch of extras that most people never watch anyway. ughh...<br><br>I'd go down on a long man for a quality dual format player. Then I would spend the next month shitting in envelopes and mailing them to the key backers of both formats in protest of their senseless dividing of the market for the sake of being able to MAYBE say "the winnars are we!". <br><br>It'd be one thing if there were actual good movies on both formats (HDDVD does have the lead here, by a mile). But 94.234265% of these movies are pure worthless shit. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jsn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 4:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA["Blu-ray content providers are hesitant to use VC-1 since MS owns the licensing rights to it"<br><br>Not entirely correct.<br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VC-1" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VC-1</a><br><br>"Although widely considered to be Microsoft's product, there are actually 15 other companies in the VC-1 patent pool (as of April 2006)."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Sununu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 4:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[I own 5 of the movies on D-theater.... <br><br>I do give props to Fox for using DTS MA, but that really sucks for people with the Samsung BD player.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WiFiSpy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 4:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[And I should add that a lot of those companies are Blu-ray companies themselves. So that still doesn't explain why VC-1 is not being used for Blu-ray, even though it's very successful on HD-DVD.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Sununu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 4:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Okay, this is sounding good. I understand why ALL of those are MPEG-4, because either they are on a 25 gb or REALLY LONG. Now, we will see more of Blu-ray's potential (but not yet all of it).<br><br>What I really can't wait to see is a relatively short movie encoded in MPEG-2 on 50 GB. Because MPEG-4 and VC-1 aren't "better" (nor is MPEG-2) but they work differently. The increase in quality is not even with the bit rate. Eventually, the increase becomes neglegible, and the "less efficient" codec (MPEG-2) actually surpasses the "more efficient" one (MPEG-4 or VC-1). And yes, this takeover actually occurs in the realm of Blu-ray's ability!<br><br>Let's just hope that dual-layer firmware upgrade happens real soon, or you'll be seeing Samsung BD players all over Ebay.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin M.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2006 10:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fox announces first Blu-ray releases: 8 titles, BD-J, MPEG-4 AVC, 50GB]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/08/31/fox-announces-first-blu-ray-releases-8-titles-bd-j-mpeg-4-avc/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is an ok release, Kingdom of Heaven, and behind enemy lines should be good movies to show off blu ray capability.  The whole dual layer thing is pointless, 25GB is fine for a movie encoded in VC-1 or Mpeg-4, unless its really long like kingdom of heaven or they want to put on alot of extras.  Its nice to see the DTSHD also, as this is also more effiecient than the full LPCM that has been on sony discs.  Now in terms of price, if these movies actually sell for $40, then I wouldnt buy one of them.  Blu ray just isnt marketing itself well, $1000 for a player and $40 per movie, not worth the jump from the Denon 3910 I already own.  This is the reason, I already own the HDDVD player, at $450 I get HD and it does very well with standard DVDs, almost as well as my Denon.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Juice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2006 7:51PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>