<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</guid><description><![CDATA[LyngSat says DirecTV will launch another sat on September 19, 2006 an 9S Ariane 5 101.0°W 54 Ku tps.<br>The 101° position is where some HD content is already currently located.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NVTanner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2006 6:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is why I'll be switching to Verizon when then hook up my neighborhood. Which will be before they launch their satellite.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2006 10:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</guid><description><![CDATA[DirecTV doesn't do HD, they only do HDlite. Kind of like EDTV (something less than HD).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GhostDoggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2006 6:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</guid><description><![CDATA[GhostDoggy...um no, DirecTV is miles beyond EDTV and should not be compared.  It is still 720p/1080i to the set.  Now the compression is does effect the image, but it isn't even close to EDTV.  Your comment is uncalled for.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChicagoOne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2006 6:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</guid><description><![CDATA[@GhostDoggy<br><br>I've heard that from other people as well.  Where did you get that information that DirecTV is not HD?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Captain Obvious]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2006 6:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</guid><description><![CDATA[In fact...to continue, the local HD-PBS station here (WTTW) pumps out TERRIBLE HD content due to compression.  Water turns to blocks, etc.  I think DirecTV's HD image is the most consistent and is above par when compared to some of the crap that local over the air stations and even Comcast does.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChicagoOne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2006 6:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</guid><description><![CDATA[I still think it makes sense to merge DirecTV and Dish.  If Charlie Ergin (sic) wasn't so universally hated [allegedly] in Congress, that tentative merger from a couple of years back would have sailed through.  Then they could pool their satellite resources together and make a unified competitor to the entrenched cablecos AND the telephone monoliths entering the market.<br><br>Maybe putting Ergin (sic) and Murdoch together would cancel each other out, just as in mathematics two negatives become a positive.<br><br><br>ps. same goes for Sirus and XM.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Jeremy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2006 7:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ NVTanner<br><br>I looked at DirecTV's FCC application for the 9S satellite and it says that the 9s is a replamecent for their DirecTV 1 satellite at 72.5 W, no mention of additional bandwith....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Xavier]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2006 7:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</guid><description><![CDATA[DirecTV already lost me to Dish.  I'm not waiting around for them to get their act together.  Why should I wait, when there's a vastly better alternative?  I'm loving my 30 HD channels and the 622 DVR.  I can always reevaluate in a year.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2006 7:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</guid><description><![CDATA[in fact directv is HD-lite. its WAY better than EDTV of course, but the signal is 1280x1080i scaled to 1920x1080i instead of true 1920x1080i.<br><br>well, its probably x1088 since that's divisible by 16.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2006 7:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br>This is great news!  I just got the Directv HD DVR(HR10-250) hoping that directv won't turn off the MPEG-2 HD feeds until summer 2008.  With the second launch in late 2007, this looks very likely.  This news along with the fact that the 6.3 release to the TiVo software is going to be downloaded in the next week or so confirms I made the right decision.<br><br>For all those that have Dish, doesn't the VIP622 only have 1 OTA tuner?  I would much rather have a real TiVo with 2 HD OTA tuners than have Monsters HD.  To each his own I guess.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2006 7:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</guid><description><![CDATA[Considering the Sunday Ticket contract runs through 2010, I will likely be staying with DirecTV at least until then.  That is, unless the NFL suddenly folds.<br><br>Very, very disappointed with every other aspect of DirecTV though.  It all has to do with HDTV.  I've been a customer for 3 years, but had an HDTV for 1, and that's when things went south.  I don't live in a market good enough for them to provide my local HD channels; I will likely have to ditch my HR10-250 once more channels actually do become available; I've waited over a year for the 6.3 TiVo update, etc etc.<br><br>The only bright spot I have is that hopefully I will be moving in the next 6-9 months, and when I do you can bet I will be sure to install a nice, powerful OTA solution instead of the indoor antenna I have now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2006 7:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</guid><description><![CDATA[Xavier<br><br>Just passing on whats in LyngSat on launches for this year. Possibly bad information, although LyngSat is usually right on these dates and equipment sent up.<br>I myself am just looking forward to seeing more sats sent up to orbit....the sooner.... the better!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NVTanner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2006 8:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</guid><description><![CDATA[DTV and Dish both over compress so for now I'll stick to cable. My local Brighthouse Networks (cable) has much better image quality. Satellites need to beef up the bandwidth and hurry up with MPEG4.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Lyon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2006 8:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thanks NVTanner I appreciate the info either way....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Xavier]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2006 10:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, cable and telcos have so much more localized bandwidth.  Theres no denying that OnDemand is awesome technology... and that they can do HDTV OnDemand...<br><br>maybe as a precursor to fully merging, DirecTV and Dish could make an arrangement to share bandwidth across commonly broadcasted channels.  That way there wouldnt be two ESPNs, two Comedy Centrals, two New York NBC Affiliates, etc, broadcast, and they could each have A LOT more bandwidth for additional programming.  But that would probably require a lot of consumer hardware changes... idk]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[charlie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2006 11:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIRECTV's satellite launch plans (READ: more HD content)]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/11/directvs-satellite-launch-plans-read-more-hd-content/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, the DISH VIP622 only has one OTA tuner. But I don't miss a second one, I have my networks available in HD on DISH, so I can record three HD network shows at once, one OTA and two on the Sat Tuners. I have yet needed more than 2 actually, but I actually have one night the coming season where I am planning on recording three things at once (ABC,NBC and CBS!). So two OTA tuners might be nice, but I don't really need it. Definitely not worth $800 for a new TIVO HD. <br><br>As for the Sats for DirectTV, hopefully this will give DirectTV more HD channels, competition is always a good thing, and we all need more HD! :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jolard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2006 11:30AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>