<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for </title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good devise I need it! But prise is to high!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fokk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 13th 2006 11:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ive been waiting for this to come out. Price is reasonable considering the capabilities.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 13th 2006 12:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's reasonable for the price (although I bet their profit margin is still very high as it looks like a relatively simple device).  Now my question is can it really capture content from any HDMI source (read: does it *support* HDCP, kinda ironic if it does) and what are the system requirements for capturing the video/audio.  My thinking is that uncompressed video and sound will be HUGE.  An HD-DVD/BD movie can be 25GB or so in size COMPRESSED (think jpeg or mp3).  Now capturing UNCOMPRESSED video (think bmp or wav) will be a serious under taking, multi TB probably, then reencoding that bad boy back to a workable format (VC-1, H.264, MPEG2) will take some serious time and horsepower to accomplish.  However it probably won't be a big issue in a year or 2 when quad-core CPU's are released and multi-TB hard drives.<br><br>I would not be suprised to see it suddenly disappear into thin air either as it scheduled to be released next month.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 13th 2006 2:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</guid><description><![CDATA[There is exactly 0 chance that this will support HDCP.  None, zip, zilch.  It would facially violate the HDMI license.  This is for transmission of unprotected, uncompressed raw data from an HDMI-capable source.  Read: an HDV camera.  You can try to plug in your HD-DVD player, but it will fail the handshake, guaranteed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 13th 2006 2:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</guid><description><![CDATA[the studios have already enabled HDCP on digital outputs for this reason exactly - they want to avoid digital copies. now, the image constraint token that limits output resolution on component video will probably not be enabled solely because of this device since this has nothign to do with recording from component.  further, thsi device will undoubtedly not support hdcp recording.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 13th 2006 2:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do the studio's really need to worry?  The biggest reason is will people actually download 25+ GB for a TV show?  I've looked at the torrents sites and there aren't many people doing it.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pete]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 13th 2006 3:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</guid><description><![CDATA[It probably does not support HDCP but it does say on their site:<br><br> *Intensity features HDMI-in for connecting to cameras and digital set-top boxes for the highest quality capture.*<br><br>So it's a bit vague.  I was under the assumption that HDMI was *always* HDCP compliant, where DVI was a hit or miss proposition (ie. My upscaling Denon DVD player has a HCDP-compliant DVI port, my PC does not, etc).  I wonder then if there are some STB's with HDMI ports that are not HDCP-complaint?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2006 7:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who said this card has to not ignore the HDCP? But, as Jim stated the ability and the desire to capture 1080P uncompressed content (at 1-2 Gbps) are two completely different worlds. How many people have computers in their home to disk-cache 200MB per second for an hour or two, and how much time will you labor into to edit and compressed the resulting content?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GhostDoggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 13th 2006 8:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</guid><description><![CDATA[#3 is correct.<br><br>When DVD "ripping" was in it's infancy 9+ Gb of free HD space was definitely a premium for your average home computer. Encoding the DVD data to VCD or DivX took all night (8+ hours) on the ~1GHz single core CPU's of the time.<br><br>Learn the lessons of history. PC's eventually catch up.<br><br>It is only a matter of time that someone releases a HMDI-HDMI convertor that filters out the HDCP so this card coudl work on such content. Or conversly someone hacks this card (driver software?) to allow HDCP recording.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2006 9:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</guid><description><![CDATA[Two things:<br><br>A Black Magic representative told me it would not record the HDMI output of my HD-DVR.<br><br>The real big value for us video editors is to actually see our software editing timeline (like in Final Cut Pro or iMovie) live out to an HDTV.  Last week, this required at least a $1000 card in our Macs or PCs.  This alone makes the card an incredible value.<br><br>-Christopher]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Johnson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2006 5:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/09/13/hdmi-capture-card-for-249/</guid><description><![CDATA[would you be able to hook up a console on this and play games at full HD?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zjoden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2006 10:18AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>