"Assuming both use VC-1, the Blu-ray version should look better than the HD DVD version. 35gb extra should make a big difference."
Hmmm.... 50GB minus 30GB does not equal 35GB.
If they both use VC-1 then I seriously doubt that Warner will do a different encode at a different bitrate for each format. Plus no word here of Warner even using 50GB Blu-Ray.
"We're still not sure how many people are willing to pay a few extra bucks for a combo disc, but Warner is putting a lot of weight behind them."
Since I want this in a high-def format, I have no choice but to pay extra for the Combo format.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
"Assuming both use VC-1, the Blu-ray version should look better than the HD DVD version. 35gb extra should make a big difference."
Hmmm.... 50GB minus 30GB does not equal 35GB.
If they both use VC-1 then I seriously doubt that Warner will do a different encode at a different bitrate for each format. Plus no word here of Warner even using 50GB Blu-Ray.
"We're still not sure how many people are willing to pay a few extra bucks for a combo disc, but Warner is putting a lot of weight behind them."
Since I want this in a high-def format, I have no choice but to pay extra for the Combo format.