<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</guid><description><![CDATA[I actually think the normal cable looks better<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tgrove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2006 5:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</guid><description><![CDATA[Spend the money on an ISF calibration.  It'll improve the picture from ALL of your sources!  No snake oil in an off-white, plastic box needed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2006 6:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</guid><description><![CDATA[I second that.  Normal looks better.  Samsung has DNIe to "enhance" image quality as well.  It can look good in certain areas, scenes, etc. but once you stip it down and eventually turn it off you find an even better picture 'underneath' that was previously hidden.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wesley Hester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2006 5:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have seen something almost identical in Cyberlink's PowerDVD player (version 6 I think).  I have a HTPC and when I play back HD content (recorded transport stream then converted to MPEG2) in PowerDVD there is a menu option to do some enhancement.  I can't remember exactly what the name is, but I swear it did the same thing.  You can even do it split-screen.  It runs the CPU utilization up fairly high when it's turned on.  It's not critical, but it did usually make the picture look a little better, especially ocean/nature/landscape type stuff.  I didn't like it turned on for movies though.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2006 5:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</guid><description><![CDATA[Normal looks better - save your money!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dana Decker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2006 5:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you want to crush your black and increase your contrast, 2 steps up on contrast and 2 steps down on brightness should get the same result.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2006 6:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would have to agree that the normal looks better.  The image is crispier and brighter in my opinion.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[seattle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2006 6:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</guid><description><![CDATA[It looks like you lose too many details in the dark areas. If you want to throw away money, I'll give you my PayPal address; you can just send it to me!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gymj22]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2006 7:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</guid><description><![CDATA[What is to say that has already been said? This is a cheap gimmick that basically tweaks contrast and brightness and artificial edge enhancement to make the picture look 'better'.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[saq]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2006 10:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</guid><description><![CDATA["Spend the money on an ISF calibration." Yeah, because that piuece of paper they got means they are the best of the best at calibrating something.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GhostDoggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2006 5:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</guid><description><![CDATA[On the side-by-side images it appears that the processed image would be better, but on the whole-frame images the unprocessed images does appear to be more natural.  Very odd.<br><br>Rod<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod Diaz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2006 12:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</guid><description><![CDATA[$250? Hahahahaha. Wow. Do they think the HT enthusiasts that have money to spend are idiots? I mean come on. It's obviously crushing blacks, a dynamic enhancement like suped up contrast, gamma, etc. This is no processor, and it makes the picture worse. Lastly, GROSSLY overpriced. LOL]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Lyon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2006 12:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope you didn't pay for that thing.  What a joke.  If you care enough to have a good picture, spend that on a calibration!  <br><br>Was that an HR20 acting as your DVR or WMCE?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2006 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</guid><description><![CDATA[Rick - It is a Motorola 6412 HDTV tuner/DVR from Comcast - and no...I didn't pay for the cables.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Burns]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2006 1:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah-- I don't get it...calibration would be more effective--<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dream]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 12th 2006 12:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Review: RazorVision HDMI video cable]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/09/engadget-hd-review-razorvision-hdmi-video-cable/</guid><description><![CDATA["Click on for screenshots (big pics so slow load times for dial-up) that will let you come to your own conclusion on whether these are something you need to add to your high-def gear."<br><br>Is there such a thing as a person with High-Def and Dial-up?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 20th 2006 12:55AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>