http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/ Engadget HD Comments for Panasonic DMP-BD10 Blu-ray player reviewed http://hd.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://hd.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/Oct 14th 2006 10:26PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/Oct 15th 2006 12:17AMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/Oct 15th 2006 9:39PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/Oct 15th 2006 7:40AMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/
Your question SHOULD have been "Why? When you can get an HD-DVD player for less than $400." You'll even get lossless audio NOW, instead of with the Blu-Ray favorite motto, "We'll be good LATER."



]]>Oct 15th 2006 10:10AMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/
Also don't forget that you can get a HD-DVD player for the XBox 360 for just $200 with a free copy of King Kong is the report was true which is sweet. King Kong wil look awesome in HD. I think HD-DVD has MUCH better movies. I have already more then 20 like Enter the Dragon, Willy Wonka (old and new), Batman Begins, Serenity and lots more. Also coming soon what i can't wait for is MATRIX is HD will be awesome and look super sweet.]]>Oct 15th 2006 1:14PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/Oct 16th 2006 8:02AMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/Oct 15th 2006 2:41PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/Oct 15th 2006 5:29PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/
The fact is this: both formats just aren't as valuable to the general market like DVD was over VHS. Improved picture quality for the %15 of customers in the US who have TVs to support it is not the same leap that all of DVD's features brought to the table. I suspect it will be another year before there's any movement for either format.]]>Oct 16th 2006 10:46AMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/14/panasonic-dmp-bd10-blu-ray-player-reviewed/http://www.thedvdwars.com/index.cfm!!! ]]>Oct 16th 2006 9:58PM