<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just hope that 1080i doesn’t die with it.  Very few flat panels can handle it with out down converting.  content providers just might notice that 90% of the market owns a 720p TV.  1080i looks much better on my CRT.  If the networks try and save bandwidth and run everything at 720p, there will be no need for 1080i anymore.<br><br>What will I do with that monster entertainment cabinet I bought????<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BRYAN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 23rd 2006 1:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[im still waiting to replace my crt trinitron monitor. it connects to my HDbox and it displays full 1080 beauty.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IndianaJones54]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 23rd 2006 1:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[the correct phrase is "couldn't care less"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[greenstork]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 23rd 2006 2:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA["when the high-definition broadcast signal cutoff is complete"<br><br>From my understanding it's not a "high-definition broadcast", it's digital.  The FCC said that the Analog signal must be replaced with a digital signal, which doesn't mean the "new" content will be HD (although most might be), but it will be sent digitally.  What this means if you have an over the air antenna, you won't see snow any longer in a picture, it will be either on or off, and if the signal is low, you will get major amounts of pixelation.  Also this means that if you are using an over the air antenna to receive television, you will no longer be able to receive any channels.  You will need an some type of set-top tuner to pull in the digital feed, and give it to an analog input (coax, composite, s-video, component) that your TV will understand.<br><br>There will be MANY stations that still present the majority of their programming in NON-HD, but it will be broadcast digitally, instead of over analog means.  <br><br>Already most of the cable providers and sat companies already send the signal digitally, so for them it's not a big deal (besides the FCC mandate to move to CableCards, which is a whole different issue).  So that cut off you are referring to isn't an HDTV cutoff, it's a digital/analog cutoff.  <br><br>The CRT TV will still work with those signals, but will require a different tuner to pick up the digital signals instead of the analog ones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 23rd 2006 2:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[When I got my Samsung 30" Slim-CRT HDTV a few months back, I was heavily considering a DLP, LCD or Plasma. However, I just couldn't get over the color and black level difference between those competing technologies and the trusty CRTs.<br><br>It's the same with design. You wouldn't design color-accurate imagery and work with video on a LCD monitor, otherwise you're headed for trouble.<br><br>Until these competing technologies can find a way to accurately reproduce the deep, black levels and color saturation without being shoved in the corner by ambient light interference, I just don't see CRTs going away any time soon.<br><br>It's a shame, though, because those suckers are heavy. My TV is 100 lbs. It's size and shape doesn't make it easy to move around on my own. :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 23rd 2006 2:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a 120 lb 30" 1080i CRT, that thing is heavy! It took me, my mom, and my brother to lug it up the stairs to my room. I just recently moved it to my brother's room since i just got a new LCD 1080p tv, and it was super heavy all over again. Well I'm happy I got a really light flat panel, because I could carry that myself. Although the black levels aren't great and the saturation could use a slight bit more, I think the benefit of the weight far outweighs the other problems. Plus my old CRT HDTV was displaying green pixels in dark areas and it wasn't that great looking that way. I like my new LCD 10x better than my CRT because it is 1080p, so I can run my PC perfectly at 1920x1080 and it's easy to see with no flicker, and it also properly deinterlaces 1080i movies to 1080p24, which is amazing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 23rd 2006 2:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a 30" Sanyo CRT HD set and my parents have an LCD set (different maker) but when I look at the picture on their set compared to my CRT, I can really see the difference.  The LCD picture is flat (i.e. constrast is non-existent), blacks are gray, saturation is minimal.  I love the look of the image on my CRT and it actually weighs less than my old 32" 4:3 set!  Long live CRT until manufacturers can produce something comparable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 23rd 2006 3:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've got a 2003 era 32" 4:3 Zenith CRT HDTV (32V37).  I got it because it was the first reasonably priced HDTV I found with a built in HD tuner.<br><br>Actually, the 4:3 is a compromise that has worked out wonderfully.  It works great with non-HD content (no bars), and I just zoom it on 16:9 material.  It seems like the NFL and MLB have adjusted their HD content for 4:3, since the scores are no longer cut off when you zoom their 16:9 content.<br><br>I've seen a good number of 4:3 CRT digital TVs out there, all very reasonably priced.  Some are HD, some are not.  Either way, I would say to find something that you can afford, and just do it.  <br><br>While most people have been hemming and hawing the last few years, I've been enjoying HDTV.  Just get something that you can afford.  CRTs are cheap, just do it.  One day 50" 1080p plasmas will be $500, and THEN you can upgrade again.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Buzzcut]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 23rd 2006 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Most people are lemmings. They'll buy LCD/Plasma/DLP simply because it's what the TV companies want them to buy (conveyed by their marketing). And TV companies are doing it because the markup on the new technologies is greater (sales prices minus productions costs). <br><br>A calibrated rpCRT will beat 95% of the other screens except for some very high-end displays that are *way* out of my price range. In other words: "I won't be upgrading for quite a while."<br><br>It's a shame people are being force-fed these other technologies. Sadly, you hardly see CRTs on display at big box stores anymore, so of course they're under selling.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 26th 2006 9:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[What's Engadget HD talking about. CRT TV's are already dead. Theres Not one CRT TV at Bestbuy or Circuit City for Sale on their racks anymore.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GioNYC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 23rd 2006 3:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[That is mostly correct. Digtal tv broadcasts are not truely sent as a binary value but 1/4 a bite. Over any specific wavelength there are 4 levels coresponding to 00, 01, 10, or 11. This allows for a doubling of precieved bandwidth.<br><br>Many CRT tv's are comming with digital tuners and will work when the change is made aswell.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 23rd 2006 4:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm with Buzzcut, I have a 4:3, 27" Samsung Slimfit CRT HDTV. The price differen is about $500, and no current TV offer a picture as good as a CRT. The size ins't a problem a as me and my dad move it in, and we never really ever move it. I will get a SED thought, for my new house]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt T.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 26th 2006 9:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I luv when people comment on my panasonic 34'' 16/9 crt, that it has the best picture they have seen. then i tell them the  price. i wish it was thinner,bigger,lighter, but until sed hits this is what i watch. Quality stil is cool.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 23rd 2006 10:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wouldnt trade my Sony 34"XBR Super Fine Pitch HDTV CRT for anything.  The picture is somewhat dimmer than an LCD or plasma, but man, this is the finest picture quality I have seen in a consumer HDTV.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Johnson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 24th 2006 1:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a CRT SDTV still, can't afford another TV. It's a 25" Fisher, manufactured in 1991. :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DarknessTear]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 24th 2006 6:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA["I have a CRT SDTV still, can't afford another TV. It's a 25" Fisher, manufactured in 1991. :P"<br><br>And I bet SD cable programming looks better on that than any HDTV anywhere!<br><br>-CJ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Johnson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 24th 2006 12:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm buying a new TV today and its a toss up between the Samsung 30" flat tube at best buy and the Olevia 32" at office depot.  Same price, I trust the samsung name more, 2" difference doesn't bug me, I like the picture quality of CRT but they're heavy as shit (plus I might be moving several times over the next few years).  Does the samsung display 720p natively?  help me out fellow HD geeks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 24th 2006 2:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[The market has spoken and the future belongs to flat-panels. Let's give CRT's a dignified funeral and lay it to rest next to VCRs, cassete players, and record players.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Naman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 24th 2006 4:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I purchased the Song XBR960 last year and don't regreat it... looks better than any other TV out there. It was heavy but how many times do you need to move it? It's a good work out- stop being so lazy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogden2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 25th 2006 1:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Eric got it exactly right!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ira]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 31st 2006 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Requiem for the impending death of CRT televisions]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/</guid><description><![CDATA[GioNYC:<br><br>Funny, how do you explain the 30" LG SlimFit 1080 CRT I bought LAST NIGHT at BestBuy then?<br><br>1. It was $539. CRT beats them all on price.<br>2. CRT beats LCD hands down on image.<br>3. Who cares if it's heavy? I didn't have too much difficulty getting it up my 3rd floor walkup last night.<br>4. I took the extra money I saved by going CRT and bought a sweet upconverting DVD player. Was going to go HDDVD or BR, but I'm sitting it out until those drop in price.<br><br>I'm pleased as pie with my choice. The picture is FANTASTIC.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 7:11PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>