Engadget HD - Comments for Sharp's AQUOS LC-32GS is "world's first" 1080p 32-inch LCD: why? http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/ Engadget HD Comments for Sharp's AQUOS LC-32GS is "world's first" 1080p 32-inch LCD: why? http://hd.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif Engadget HD http://hd.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/<![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's AQUOS LC-32GS is "world's first" 1080p 32-inch LCD: why?]]>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/Dec 12th 2006 9:09AM<![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's AQUOS LC-32GS is "world's first" 1080p 32-inch LCD: why?]]>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/
Monitor anyone? FOr that purpose, viewing distance is a merely 2-3 feet.]]>Dec 12th 2006 10:24AM<![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's AQUOS LC-32GS is "world's first" 1080p 32-inch LCD: why?]]>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/
A 32" 1080p TV is a waste unless you sit only 4-5' away.]]>Dec 15th 2006 4:07AM<![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's AQUOS LC-32GS is "world's first" 1080p 32-inch LCD: why?]]>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/Dec 12th 2006 9:31AM<![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's AQUOS LC-32GS is "world's first" 1080p 32-inch LCD: why?]]>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/
So I agree 1080p has it's uses even on a small screen such as this...but don't fool yourself if your wanting to just use this as a screen for watching Movies. I think everyone on the blogsphere has come to the conclusion that 1080p is perceptually no better than 720p on screens smaller than 55" or so when watching Movies, TV or Games.]]>Dec 12th 2006 10:05AM<![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's AQUOS LC-32GS is "world's first" 1080p 32-inch LCD: why?]]>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/Dec 12th 2006 10:09AM<![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's AQUOS LC-32GS is "world's first" 1080p 32-inch LCD: why?]]>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/
If you want to give up the tuners, speakers, and HDMI, you can get a 30" Dell for around $1300 and it does better than a 1080p. Its resolution is 2560x1600 or something like that. The Apple monitor can be had for $1999. While the built-in tuner, etc may be nice, if anyone is going to use this TV for their computer needs, it is better to just buy the 30" LCD since you get an even better resolution. I am pretty sure both monitors will get an upgrade to HDMI/HDCP soon.]]>Dec 12th 2006 11:26AM<![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's AQUOS LC-32GS is "world's first" 1080p 32-inch LCD: why?]]>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/
This could indeed be a great convergence device. Hopefully it will be the standard 16:9 shape and not cost as much as they're saying. (And hopefully those speakers come off!)]]>Dec 13th 2006 3:38AM<![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's AQUOS LC-32GS is "world's first" 1080p 32-inch LCD: why?]]>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/Dec 14th 2006 2:44PM<![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's AQUOS LC-32GS is "world's first" 1080p 32-inch LCD: why?]]>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/
A simple analogy can be made that most people were/are ok with Composite video, yet some preferred to have S-video or Component. The majority don't care, but for those that do, better options are available. ]]>Dec 14th 2006 9:11PM<![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's AQUOS LC-32GS is "world's first" 1080p 32-inch LCD: why?]]>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/
Who in the world wants to browse with only 720P vertical space? Add a couple IE toolbars into the browser and you have hardly any space left for web content!

Bob H]]>Dec 21st 2006 11:47AM<![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's AQUOS LC-32GS is "world's first" 1080p 32-inch LCD: why?]]>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/Apr 24th 2007 5:22PM<![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's AQUOS LC-32GS is "world's first" 1080p 32-inch LCD: why?]]>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/12/sharps-aquos-lc-32gs-is-worlds-first-1080p-32-inch-lcd-wh/
Read this thread: http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1171795
Don't just read the first page. Keep reading. ]]>Jun 5th 2007 12:18AM