<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for The quest for an HDTV this holiday season</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/16/the-quest-for-an-hdtv-this-holiday-season/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for The quest for an HDTV this holiday season</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The quest for an HDTV this holiday season]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/16/the-quest-for-an-hdtv-this-holiday-season/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/16/the-quest-for-an-hdtv-this-holiday-season/</guid><description><![CDATA[From an article I saw . . . Imaging Science Foundation (ISF), a group that consults for home-theater manufacturers and trains professional video calibrators, when it says that the most important aspect of picture quality is contrast ratio, the second-most important is color saturation, and the third is color accuracy. Though resolution may be the most talked-about spec these days, it comes in fourth on the ISF list, and after you sit watching five TVs lined up side by side, you understand why.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 16th 2006 6:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The quest for an HDTV this holiday season]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/16/the-quest-for-an-hdtv-this-holiday-season/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/16/the-quest-for-an-hdtv-this-holiday-season/</guid><description><![CDATA[For all of his supposed research into HDTVs, Mr. Boutin seems not really to have done a very thorough job. <br><br>For instance (and this is just one obvious set of errors among many), when he riffs on DLP TVs, he talks about how "bulky" they are, and how he doesn't want a "200-lb God Box" in his living room. Well, sorry to disappoint, but DLP is neither as bulky nor as heavy as he purports. Samsung for instance (and I'm not flacking for them, it's just true) has a "slim" DLP TV that's less than 11" deep and weighs just over 50 lbs. That's hardly the bulky, 200-lb demon of Mr. Boutin's nightmares.<br><br>I think the truth is that Mr. Boutin hasn't owned a TV in 15 years, and he was looking for a reason not to buy into the HDTV "revolution".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 4:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The quest for an HDTV this holiday season]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/16/the-quest-for-an-hdtv-this-holiday-season/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2006/12/16/the-quest-for-an-hdtv-this-holiday-season/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've been shopping for a smaller TV/DVD combo for the kitchen. It's surprisingly hard to find a small TV with an ATSC tuner. I use antennas for reception, and I know that the clock is counting down toward the end of analog broadcasting. So, where are all the digital tuners? There's a lot of deceptive wording in the ads, but when you finally get to the specifications, no digital tuner. This is going to be an unpleasant surprise for a lot of folks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Cox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2006 6:20AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>