<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Bigger &amp; biggest HDTVs: Sharp's 108 vs. Samsung's 102</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/01/09/bigger-and-biggest-hdtvs-sharps-108-vs-samsungs-102/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Bigger &amp; biggest HDTVs: Sharp's 108 vs. Samsung's 102</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bigger &amp; biggest HDTVs: Sharp's 108 vs. Samsung's 102]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/01/09/bigger-and-biggest-hdtvs-sharps-108-vs-samsungs-102/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/01/09/bigger-and-biggest-hdtvs-sharps-108-vs-samsungs-102/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why did Sharp hire Leather Boot Barbie to stand next to its Aquos? Instead, a 3-foot tall midget would've made this set look absolutely gignormous.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Brundage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2007 2:33PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>