<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Philips not yet phasing out plasmas, focusing on LCD TVs</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/03/15/philips-phasing-out-plasmas-focusing-on-lcd-tvs/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Philips not yet phasing out plasmas, focusing on LCD TVs</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips not yet phasing out plasmas, focusing on LCD TVs]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/03/15/philips-phasing-out-plasmas-focusing-on-lcd-tvs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/03/15/philips-phasing-out-plasmas-focusing-on-lcd-tvs/</guid><description><![CDATA[this completely boggles my mind. in terms of picture quality, PDP is by far the best between the two. Especially in larger sizes, i have no idea why a company would want to move away from something that is cheaper in larger sizes, and gives you a much better picture quality. At least panasonic isn't crazy...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SimbaDogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2007 11:11PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>