<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for PC Perspective attempts to review the OnAir GT USB HDTV tuner</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/03/21/pc-perspective-attempts-to-review-the-onair-gt-usb-hdtv-tuner/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for PC Perspective attempts to review the OnAir GT USB HDTV tuner</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PC Perspective attempts to review the OnAir GT USB HDTV tuner]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/03/21/pc-perspective-attempts-to-review-the-onair-gt-usb-hdtv-tuner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/03/21/pc-perspective-attempts-to-review-the-onair-gt-usb-hdtv-tuner/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why, exactly, would this damage their credibility?  They never said that this was an example of an HDTV "show," only of a 1080i signal.  And it is, since the local affiliate is obviously broadcasting a full-time 1080i transport stream.  So, what, you fault him for doing his review in the daytime (since there is almost no daytime broadcast HD)?  Its an HD signal either way, even if its not an HD show.  And the fact that it is displayed at all means that the part he is reviewing, the USB TUNER, is working as advertised/intended.<br><br>It's not exactly a slow news day for HD... I'm surprised at the need to post this kind of snotty sniping...<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 21st 2007 12:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PC Perspective attempts to review the OnAir GT USB HDTV tuner]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/03/21/pc-perspective-attempts-to-review-the-onair-gt-usb-hdtv-tuner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/03/21/pc-perspective-attempts-to-review-the-onair-gt-usb-hdtv-tuner/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm with Engadget. The least the reviewer could've done is recorded Jeopardy or a bit of a the Today Show. The notion of showing an example page with static across the top of pictures is totally ludicrous, unless you're choosing to juxtapose SD with real HD content on the same page. It's like asking an octogenarian to review the performance of a sports car. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Rosenbluh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 21st 2007 1:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PC Perspective attempts to review the OnAir GT USB HDTV tuner]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/03/21/pc-perspective-attempts-to-review-the-onair-gt-usb-hdtv-tuner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/03/21/pc-perspective-attempts-to-review-the-onair-gt-usb-hdtv-tuner/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sammi doesn't look very happy there.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 21st 2007 3:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PC Perspective attempts to review the OnAir GT USB HDTV tuner]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/03/21/pc-perspective-attempts-to-review-the-onair-gt-usb-hdtv-tuner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/03/21/pc-perspective-attempts-to-review-the-onair-gt-usb-hdtv-tuner/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why even link to a bad, nonsensical review and give them undue publicity? :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Schumann]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 21st 2007 3:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PC Perspective attempts to review the OnAir GT USB HDTV tuner]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/03/21/pc-perspective-attempts-to-review-the-onair-gt-usb-hdtv-tuner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/03/21/pc-perspective-attempts-to-review-the-onair-gt-usb-hdtv-tuner/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Josh R: Uh, that's not static.  It's the closed caption info that you don't normally see due to overscan.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[clads01]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 21st 2007 7:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PC Perspective attempts to review the OnAir GT USB HDTV tuner]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/03/21/pc-perspective-attempts-to-review-the-onair-gt-usb-hdtv-tuner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/03/21/pc-perspective-attempts-to-review-the-onair-gt-usb-hdtv-tuner/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hello, it's Ryan Pertusio from AutumnWave!<br><br>To Engadget HD: We'll happily provide you a demo unit (of the OnAir GT) if you would like to write your own review! ( Contact us: 'tech AT autumnwave DOT com' )<br><br>To Josh Rosenbluh: Normally, there are default 'Overscan' settings that hide the bar of 'static'.  This bar (as clads01 indicated) is actually some data contained within the stream, and is hidden from view. Screenshots do contain the entire picture (without any overscan). Since the PC Perspective reviewer superimposed the screenshots, it is visible in the software.<br><br>To other readers: The OnAir GT supports full HD up to 1920x1080. You can download/watch a 2 minute HD clip recorded with one of our devices at our website:<br><a href="http://www.autumnwave.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.autumnwave.com/</a><br>(Support > Downloads > OnAir HDTV Products )<br><br>I'll happily answer any questions you may have, and I'm also available for technical support (should you need it!)<br><br>Regards,<br>  - Ryan Pertusio<br><br>AutumnWave Technical Support<br>OnAir Solution North America<br><a href="http://www.autumnwave.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.autumnwave.com/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Pertusio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 23rd 2007 3:13PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>