<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for DirecTV 1 - Time Warner Cable 1</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/04/19/directv-1-time-warner-cable-1/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for DirecTV 1 - Time Warner Cable 1</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DirecTV 1 - Time Warner Cable 1]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/04/19/directv-1-time-warner-cable-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/04/19/directv-1-time-warner-cable-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[It should be Direct 1 TWC ZERO<br><br>TWC;s issue is that it never, ever gives any kind of straight talk to it's customers. They keep as much as possible totally hidden. Latest example? In NYC, they deliver 3 MORE HD channels to one neighborhood, with about 5% of the city population with no explanation why the other 95% who pay the SAME amount don't get the same content.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[riverside_guy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2007 12:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DirecTV 1 - Time Warner Cable 1]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/04/19/directv-1-time-warner-cable-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/04/19/directv-1-time-warner-cable-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Uh, you think DTV tells their customers anything?  They don't announce until its delivered either.  I'm a customer of TWC NYC and a former DTV HD customer.  You should be happy with TWC.  Its superior to DTV at this point in time.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Galicki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2007 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DirecTV 1 - Time Warner Cable 1]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/04/19/directv-1-time-warner-cable-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/04/19/directv-1-time-warner-cable-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[IF these aren't announcements,  what are they then?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brendan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2007 8:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DirecTV 1 - Time Warner Cable 1]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/04/19/directv-1-time-warner-cable-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/04/19/directv-1-time-warner-cable-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Note to TW...shut up and DO something about it! who ever get their shit together will make a shit load of money people are WANTING HD content and more of it! either DO something about or get out of the way. If DTV gets what they are claiming I'll be switching over ASAP! I love HD content and want more of it the lack of content is a joke and competition is what will drive it. we(the public) need more companies like DTV forcing crap cable companies to do more and offer more in terms of HD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Doc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2007 1:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DirecTV 1 - Time Warner Cable 1]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/04/19/directv-1-time-warner-cable-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/04/19/directv-1-time-warner-cable-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[What I find amusing about DirecTV's Back to the Future ad is when the professor say "Soon they'll have 3 times the capacity of cable. Impossible? That's what they said about my Flux Capacitor."<br><br>Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the Flux Capacitor fictional and as far as we know, IMPOSSIBLE?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2007 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DirecTV 1 - Time Warner Cable 1]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/04/19/directv-1-time-warner-cable-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/04/19/directv-1-time-warner-cable-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[TWC Sucks, and I actually helped them deploy / debug their firewire-enabled cable box in my area!<br><br>Right now, as I type this, DirectTV has WAY more than 3x as many HDTV stations as TWC.  It was a no-brainer on judge's part.  If TWC wants to really keep their customers, they should ADD MORE HDTV STATIONS, and stop sueing DirectTV.<br><br>I sure as hell am about to jump ship... I'm just waiting for a slightly greater Blu-Ray/HD-DVD saturation.<br><br>Sheesh TWC... Get a clue.<br><br>-Pie]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EatingPie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2007 10:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DirecTV 1 - Time Warner Cable 1]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/04/19/directv-1-time-warner-cable-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/04/19/directv-1-time-warner-cable-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[I do not think any of the companies are honest, especially to its consumers. DirecTV doesn't provide HD, and claiming they have more than anyone else is FOS.<br><br>But, consumers should be abused since they are cows in the field allowing the abuse instead of forcing their politicians to put laws into place to keep themselves from being abused.<br><br>Moo]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GhostDoggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2007 5:46AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>