http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/ Engadget Comments for The History Channel HD in September on DirecTV http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/May 7th 2007 5:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/
Also I am a DirecTV subscriber and most agree the HR20 is buggy.]]>May 7th 2007 5:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/
Let's see:

"We are still a long way from 100 HD channels this year."

Plus, the buggy HR20 thing.

I could go back to your other posts and easily find a dozen digs. Point is, you seem unable to do a positive post that mentions DirecTV without voicing some sort of accompanying slap.

Don't make me archive...

]]>May 7th 2007 5:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/
Why do they insist on up scaling SD in America?]]>May 7th 2007 5:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/May 7th 2007 6:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/May 7th 2007 7:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/May 7th 2007 10:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/
Bob - obviously, no, they are not talking about the three networks and repeated channels thru the US.]]>May 8th 2007 12:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/
For all the bitching people do about DirecTv most of the country has a very little great choices when it comes to tv. You can have the choice between two descent satellite companies or the triple-headed devils spawn that is Cox, Comcast, or Time-Warner cable. I know I'm 100% happier with DirecTv and Qwest than I ever was with Comcast and Qwest. My bill is also more reasonable considering all features, content and receivers I have.

For Bob, if Directv was including local HD networks in the 100 NATIONAL HD CHANNELS they have been announcing they would have been finished before 2007 even began. It's 1,500 Local HD Networks by the end of the year and 100 National HD Channels. (which includes NFL Sunday Ticket/Superfan, Nascar, MLB Extra Innings, HBO(s), History Channel, most likely all the new and old Stars, Cinemax, etc.) It's not that difficult of a promise to keep since all the technology is either currently in use(5LNB Dishes) or bought and built and about ready to be launched into space. ]]>May 9th 2007 3:42AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/Jun 6th 2007 10:26AM