<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Why upconverting DVD players can be a gimmick</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/14/why-upconverting-dvd-players-can-be-a-gimmick/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Why upconverting DVD players can be a gimmick</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Why upconverting DVD players can be a gimmick]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/14/why-upconverting-dvd-players-can-be-a-gimmick/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/14/why-upconverting-dvd-players-can-be-a-gimmick/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pretty good article, except for this:<br><br>"So now that we understand that all the signals are already being scaled, using a DVD player that scales actually makes the image get scaled twice, and as we all know, anytime you mess with a digital image, you risk mucking it up."<br><br>ALL dvd players "muck the image"  unless sending the signal either through 480i hdmi (unlikely, and sometimes still is messed with) or through digital sdi (even more unlikely.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2007 11:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Why upconverting DVD players can be a gimmick]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/14/why-upconverting-dvd-players-can-be-a-gimmick/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/14/why-upconverting-dvd-players-can-be-a-gimmick/</guid><description><![CDATA[One should, of course, have a progressive DVD player, since the 480i-480p translation is best done with information that only the DVD, and DVD player, have.  Past that, you should probably leave it to you set.  So these upconverting players are mostly just a waste of money, as the article says.  <br><br>If you want a useful extra feature, look for DivX (plays AVI files directly) and a good deinterlacer (like Faroudja's DCDi).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Murphy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2007 11:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Why upconverting DVD players can be a gimmick]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/14/why-upconverting-dvd-players-can-be-a-gimmick/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/14/why-upconverting-dvd-players-can-be-a-gimmick/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just feed my 768p LCD 480i over component as it seems to de-interlace better on the tv scaler.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike s]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2007 11:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Why upconverting DVD players can be a gimmick]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/14/why-upconverting-dvd-players-can-be-a-gimmick/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/14/why-upconverting-dvd-players-can-be-a-gimmick/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do any of the cheap upconverting players output in 480i and/or 480p via HDMI?<br><br>I'd really like to just do all digital to the TV and let the TV do the scaling.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2007 1:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Why upconverting DVD players can be a gimmick]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/14/why-upconverting-dvd-players-can-be-a-gimmick/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/14/why-upconverting-dvd-players-can-be-a-gimmick/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have to be honest, I love HD as much as the next guy, but right now DVD upscaling has been great in my house.  Between the two-year-old whose movies aren't available in HD yet, a "Finance Committee" that is waiting for the end of a format war, and (worst-of-all) crappy HD and Blu-Ray selections, upscaled dvd is where its at.<br><br>I have mid-range Mits DLP and a Tosh VHS-DVD burner with upscaling (the wife got to pick) and I am constantly amazed how much better the PQ is compared with the three other DVD players I had running at 480p over component and letting the Mits do the scaling.  Its crazy.  I was expecting it to be total crap.  I watch a ton of SD on my HDTV so I amused to poor PQ.<br><br>So here is one anecdotal piece of evidence that upscaling may not be a gimmick.<br><br><br>   ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan in DC/VA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2007 4:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Why upconverting DVD players can be a gimmick]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/14/why-upconverting-dvd-players-can-be-a-gimmick/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/14/why-upconverting-dvd-players-can-be-a-gimmick/</guid><description><![CDATA[An exception to the rule is the Xbox 360 used as a DVD player and outputting to the TV over a VGA connection. In addition to upscaling the picture, the 360's GPU provides "free" 4x anti-aliasing, which is apparently too computationally expensive for most TVs and stand-alone upscaling players to provide. The result, frankly, is difficult to tell from true HD, except that the picture tends to have a slightly "softer" look--which, considering that motion picture film tends to have a soft look anyway, usually isn't what I would call a true disadvantage.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2007 2:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Why upconverting DVD players can be a gimmick]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/14/why-upconverting-dvd-players-can-be-a-gimmick/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/14/why-upconverting-dvd-players-can-be-a-gimmick/</guid><description><![CDATA[All things being equal, a DVD player will have the scaling advantage over either an outboard scaler or a display simply because it has the raw digital data to work with. It's way to complicated to get into here, but a player that does this properly, such as the reasonably priced OPPO, does wonders ... far from a "gimick."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Moore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2007 12:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Why upconverting DVD players can be a gimmick]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/14/why-upconverting-dvd-players-can-be-a-gimmick/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/14/why-upconverting-dvd-players-can-be-a-gimmick/</guid><description><![CDATA[This article is simplistic at best. First off, MOST HDTVs today CAN display a 1:1 pixel ratio at either 720p or 1080p. The double scaling is old news.<br><br>That said, using a OPPO DVD player to upconvert to 720p on a 2nd gen 37 inch Vizio (or Westinghouse) is a good idea because the chip in the OPPO is superior to the chip in the Vizio and it will play out at native 1:1 720p.<br><br>All to the good!<br><br>What makes no sense (and I've seen this done) is upconverting a DVD to 1080i and then letting the TV do a downsqueeze back down to fit the display. This ends up being the worst of both worlds. Artifacts introduced in the upconvert are then used as picture elements in the downconvert. Whoops.<br><br>For those with a better chip in the TV, the lossless digital signal traveling at 480i or 480p over HDMI will give the TV's chip a better (and lossless) signal to work with.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rmcgraw]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 30th 2007 3:43AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
