rather than flame on plasma about "higher power consumption", have you done a side-by-side test to confirm that it's actually true? From what I've heard, Plasma has more variable power consumption than LCDs. As for burn-in, that's pretty much a non-issue. Any "persistent" images I've experienced on plasma go away pretty fast. The image quality on plasma was the winner for me.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Do people prefer higher power consumption and burn in as well?
rather than flame on plasma about "higher power consumption", have you done a side-by-side test to confirm that it's actually true? From what I've heard, Plasma has more variable power consumption than LCDs. As for burn-in, that's pretty much a non-issue. Any "persistent" images I've experienced on plasma go away pretty fast. The image quality on plasma was the winner for me.