I really don't understand why the ruling went the way it did. Were the ads factually incorrect? Ads are usually given almost too much leeway. I just don't see what's so improper with the ad.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I really don't understand why the ruling went the way it did. Were the ads factually incorrect? Ads are usually given almost too much leeway. I just don't see what's so improper with the ad.