How many have access to equipment that can prove or disprove the marketed claims of 35000 to 1 contrast ratio? And even if you had access to the rather very expensive (and sensitive) equipment to measure within 50% of the marketed CR claims, how many of you have an environment that would benefit from such performance if proved to be available?
I know very few people that have a bat cave like myself. Most of the mainstream folks do not want a bat cave and as a such wouldn't benefit from 90% of this marketed claim. As such, why not just make the lie more substantial and claim something bigger?
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
How many have access to equipment that can prove or disprove the marketed claims of 35000 to 1 contrast ratio? And even if you had access to the rather very expensive (and sensitive) equipment to measure within 50% of the marketed CR claims, how many of you have an environment that would benefit from such performance if proved to be available?
I know very few people that have a bat cave like myself. Most of the mainstream folks do not want a bat cave and as a such wouldn't benefit from 90% of this marketed claim. As such, why not just make the lie more substantial and claim something bigger?
Someone has thier panties in a bunch. Mad at Sony for coming home late last night?