The HDMI is better because it is the only solution if you have devices that require an HDCP compliant cable. Plus on some HD-DVD and Blu-Ray players if you don't have the HDCP compliant cord picture quality can be lost or even unavailble. That only applies to the movie studios who actually take advantage of that copyright HDCP stuff. The whole reason for HDCP is to stop people from making illegal copies of the new HD movies.
I agree. Who cares if component is capable of the same signals? You can't push 1080p with it and never will for HD Disks. Sure, everyone loves making their own cables (sarcasm), but don't expect everyone to just nod their head.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
The HDMI is better because it is the only solution if you have devices that require an HDCP compliant cable. Plus on some HD-DVD and Blu-Ray players if you don't have the HDCP compliant cord picture quality can be lost or even unavailble. That only applies to the movie studios who actually take advantage of that copyright HDCP stuff. The whole reason for HDCP is to stop people from making illegal copies of the new HD movies.
I agree. Who cares if component is capable of the same signals? You can't push 1080p with it and never will for HD Disks. Sure, everyone loves making their own cables (sarcasm), but don't expect everyone to just nod their head.