<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for CNBC HD won't be HD</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for CNBC HD won't be HD</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CNBC HD won't be HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just like ESPN HD started out]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Murphy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 17th 2007 4:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CNBC HD won't be HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[ESPN HD atleast had some HD when they launched. According to this article the only thing that will be in HD is the graphics etc.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 17th 2007 4:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CNBC HD won't be HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[So basically the "Burn-in-Champions" at CNBC are going to take this opportunity to use the wider frame to stick in more static graphics, to cement their title as the "number one channel for burn-in on plasmas everywhere!"<br><br>Disclaimers to prevent flame fests: Yes, I own a plasma.  Yes I know  burn in is very rare, and only happens in the craziest circumstances.  No, LCDs are not better for this reason - they still look like crap :)  No, I don't usually watch CNBC.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TrentD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 17th 2007 5:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CNBC HD won't be HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, but they at least won't be stretching everything.  WHich is an interesting question.  How about doing a "Clueless SD Upconvert Stretch " roundup later in the week.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Murphy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 17th 2007 10:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CNBC HD won't be HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's not bad since Maria Bartaromo has kind hit the wall in the last few years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 17th 2007 4:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CNBC HD won't be HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, but Becky and Erin would look great in HD.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mroach]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 17th 2007 5:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CNBC HD won't be HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[i think she's still a looker]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SimbaDogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 17th 2007 5:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CNBC HD won't be HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[That is lame. You need to have at least Studio shots in HD or you should not be able to call yourself an HD station. There needs to be some standards.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff N.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 17th 2007 5:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CNBC HD won't be HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[She might be a looker, but Patty melts for me when I touch her.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 17th 2007 5:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CNBC HD won't be HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't forget Rebecca Jarvis - sweet!<br><br>CNBC is my favorite channel, so I don't care how well they'll do their HD broadcast. At least the graphics will be organized well around the 1:78.1 image.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph R]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 17th 2007 6:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CNBC HD won't be HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great...graphics taking up even more of the screen...<br>*facepalm*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[samrum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 17th 2007 9:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CNBC HD won't be HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[They're just taking up an area that would otherwise be filled with black bars.  I don't know about you, but I'd rather see graphics than black bars.  Dumbass.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy W]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 12:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CNBC HD won't be HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm saying that they should be taking away the graphics and tickers they already have, not adding more. I could care less where they are going to be. I'd rather have two black bars than have two more large graphics showing useless/irrelevant information to whatever I'm trying to watch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[404error]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 12:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CNBC HD won't be HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess it should be said that the Fox Business Network will be launching in real HD.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SuperNoxic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 8:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CNBC HD won't be HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is it just me or is that picture horribly off...she looks sunburned]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Deathwish238]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 8:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CNBC HD won't be HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/cnbc-hd-wont-be-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Tv is going to end up being just like in Idiocracy, and if you don't know what I mean. Go and rent this genius movie from the guy who brought you "officespace"<br><br>This adding on of tickers and useless crap to the borders of the TV image is only going to get worse.<br><br>TimT]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ttringle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2007 5:51PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
