<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for HDMI Licensing exec explains cable  differences</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/09/21/hdmi-licensing-exec-explains-cable-differences/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for HDMI Licensing exec explains cable  differences</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDMI Licensing exec explains cable  differences]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/09/21/hdmi-licensing-exec-explains-cable-differences/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/09/21/hdmi-licensing-exec-explains-cable-differences/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can see some really nasty cables not handling huge bit rates too well or perhaps degrading over a long distance but thats no reason to spend £70 on a 1.5m cable. If you see a picture and over a 10 min period you see no dropout (small errors won't generally be noticed) then the cable you have is probably fine for the resolution you are using. Personally i have £5 no name cables running 720p and 1080i content and have had no issues with handshake or general transmission. My advice, don't buy more than you really need. Thats the beauty of digital.<br><br>What annoys me more is people who say they can tell the difference between co-ax and optical digital interconnects.... If you are having miss transmition on a audio cable you will soon know about it with the pops and squeaks. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2007 3:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDMI Licensing exec explains cable  differences]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/09/21/hdmi-licensing-exec-explains-cable-differences/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/09/21/hdmi-licensing-exec-explains-cable-differences/</guid><description><![CDATA[So I just connected my HD TV up with an HDMI. I had comcast cable for a while but their box only hooked up with component cables. I switched to Dish Network and now have a box that connects HDMI - I was excited, I have had a high def TV with 2 HDMI inputs I was not using.<br>I ordered one of the cables from Monoprice. <br>During the Dish Network install I got the installer talking about cables.<br>He went on a sales pitch about monster cables. I told him I would not spend that much on a cable. <br>We got into talking about why they are so much better. He said it really did not matter about the brand, but what is important was the Mhz that the cable is rated for.<br>So we looked up the monoprice cables. Their site lists: Rated Bandwidth: tested to 165 Mhz<br><br>The installer said that there were very low end and I would see some noise/pixelation on anything rated under 500 Mhz.<br>Now that I have been looking, some of these cables don't even list what they are rated at.<br><br>So you guys think the installer is full of it or is there really something to Mhz rating?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Absent-one]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2007 5:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDMI Licensing exec explains cable  differences]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/09/21/hdmi-licensing-exec-explains-cable-differences/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/09/21/hdmi-licensing-exec-explains-cable-differences/</guid><description><![CDATA[Absent-one - Cables are rated for a specific bandwidth and beyond that, you're going to see problems.  In this case it depends on the source.  If your output device puts out more than 165 MHz then, yes you will see problems.  If not, then you won't exceed the capacity of the cable and you will be seeing everything the device is capable of delivering.  You need to look at what your source devices are putting out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2007 6:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDMI Licensing exec explains cable  differences]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/09/21/hdmi-licensing-exec-explains-cable-differences/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/09/21/hdmi-licensing-exec-explains-cable-differences/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AbsentOne - your 165MHz (4.95Gbps)cables support the bandwidth required by HDMI 1.0, 1.1, 1.2 and 1.2a.  Also keep in mind that the next gen disc formats put out about 30-50Mbps peak for audio+video, so that's well below the bandwidth of your cable.  You'll know if you've exceeded the bandwidth of your cable because things won't just degrade in quality, they'll stop working altogether.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Kim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2007 7:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDMI Licensing exec explains cable  differences]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/09/21/hdmi-licensing-exec-explains-cable-differences/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/09/21/hdmi-licensing-exec-explains-cable-differences/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ah... that makes much more sense. <br>The installer didn't break it down like that, he just said a minimum of 500Mhz is what you want for a good picture. And pointed out how cheap my cables were.<br>Looks like ill need to find some good specs on my new ViP722's output.<br>So far I have not noticed any problems with the "low end cable". I do notice one heck of a difference in the HD quality compared to that of comcast. Dish Network looks much superior. Now how much of that is because of going to an HDMI capable box I dunno. Comcast was like pulling teeth to get a box with HDMI out, and never did deliver one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Absent One]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2007 6:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDMI Licensing exec explains cable  differences]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/09/21/hdmi-licensing-exec-explains-cable-differences/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/09/21/hdmi-licensing-exec-explains-cable-differences/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, Absent One, the two people that replied to you are just plain wrong.  There is no real certification for the testing on these cables, it's simply up to the manufacturer.  If they test to a certain quality, most manufacturers can be trusted to meet that minimum quality.<br><br>That's minimum quality, tho.  Your cable will not stop working when it sees higher bandwidth.  That's just not how things work.  The cables are not smart, they are simply a link from one end to another.  HDMI cables generally do not pixelate, either.  That's usually a switcher, or some other bad interface connection.<br><br>For the most part, if you buy decent cables (check Monoprice for their mid-level offerings), they will probably suit all of your needs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2007 1:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDMI Licensing exec explains cable  differences]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/09/21/hdmi-licensing-exec-explains-cable-differences/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/09/21/hdmi-licensing-exec-explains-cable-differences/</guid><description><![CDATA[Strange, I've run video over a $7 17' HDMI cable and not seen any apparent degrade in the digital signal. I would expect a binary to maybe produce 'sparklies' on the screen, but I have not seen this.<br><br>I am not about to buy into what I cannot see in terms of a difference. And I did compare this about a year ago to a $100 Monster HDMI cable, which I then returned.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GhostDoggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2007 7:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDMI Licensing exec explains cable  differences]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/09/21/hdmi-licensing-exec-explains-cable-differences/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/09/21/hdmi-licensing-exec-explains-cable-differences/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm with the highly skeptical.  Cables are quite a racket, and in the analog times, most equipment wasn't good enough to show a difference anyway.<br><br>I really don't expect a lot of people to be clamoring for 1440p.  Particularly when you have HD fans swearing that they can't tell the difference between 1080i & p.<br><br>Anyway, when in doubt, go with monoprice.  For runs 2m or less, even cheaper cables should work well too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JeffDM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2007 6:25PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>