<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for SED &amp; FED TVs might be getting cheaper</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/10/06/sed-and-fed-tvs-might-be-getting-cheaper/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for SED &amp; FED TVs might be getting cheaper</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SED &amp; FED TVs might be getting cheaper]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/10/06/sed-and-fed-tvs-might-be-getting-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/10/06/sed-and-fed-tvs-might-be-getting-cheaper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Might be getting cheaper?  Frankly, it's effectively unobtanium at the moment.  Work on commercially available first.  If Panasonic thinks there's a market for a $100k plasma, then I'd think that there might be a high end market for SED too, if it's all that it's been hyped up to be.  The technologies that we can buy get better all the time, how much can they slip on the tech treadmill such that what we have at the time will be as good as SED was promised to be, and is actually for sale?<br><br>I thought that SED was supposed to be buildable for cheap, if they said that knowing it needs carbon nanotubes, then they didn't know what they were talking about.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JeffDM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2007 2:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SED &amp; FED TVs might be getting cheaper]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/10/06/sed-and-fed-tvs-might-be-getting-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/10/06/sed-and-fed-tvs-might-be-getting-cheaper/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was thinking the same thing. I remember them saying that it would be fairly cheap to get an SED TV, then they forgot about that once they actually started to state the cost of them. I also remember when they first started making carbon nanotubes and the maker of them was saying they could be used to make a 46" HDTV for under $400. Some reason I don't see that happening anytime soon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darkest Daze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2007 6:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SED &amp; FED TVs might be getting cheaper]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/10/06/sed-and-fed-tvs-might-be-getting-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/10/06/sed-and-fed-tvs-might-be-getting-cheaper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cheaper sounds nice. Hopefully Canon and Nano will get through their current difficulties and produce something.<br><br><a href="http://www.fed-tv-reviews.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.fed-tv-reviews.com</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FED TV Guy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2007 5:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SED &amp; FED TVs might be getting cheaper]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/10/06/sed-and-fed-tvs-might-be-getting-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/10/06/sed-and-fed-tvs-might-be-getting-cheaper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sed and FED are both great technologies but as time ticks on the price goes up.<br>The main manufacturing advantage was that you could re purpose a CRT assembly line to produce them, so you saved a big chunk of cash not having to build  a whole new factory.<br><br>As CRT fabs close the advantage shrinks. LCD's have managed to catch up at the high end prices. As a reference professional monitors cost about $1100 per inch, so a 30 inch monitor costs $33,000. It's only a matter of time for technology to drop into consumers hands.<br><br>It seems the time for fed and sed is approaching a close before even one product got to market.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2007 1:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SED &amp; FED TVs might be getting cheaper]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/10/06/sed-and-fed-tvs-might-be-getting-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/10/06/sed-and-fed-tvs-might-be-getting-cheaper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good point. However, FED was on display at FPD 2007 in Japan. Fairly exclusive photos at my blog including FED display at 240 fps!!. SED? Still in hibernation or whatever you'd call it. <br><br><a href="http://www.fed-tv-reviews.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.fed-tv-reviews.com</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AllenJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2007 2:42PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>