Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm looking for a solid state drive, around 32 to 64GB, for use in my web server. The drive will contain my web sites and the operating system, either Windows Server 2008 R2 or Ubuntu. Large storage is handled by a separate RAID array, so capacity is not an issue. Rather, I am looking for the fastest, longest-lasting, and most reliable drive under $150 that is suitable to my application. Any thoughts? Thanks!"
Wikipedia???
REALLY..........
where ENTIRELY BIASED people can edit it CONSTANTLY!?!?!?
You cant be serious.........
LAME
attacking me on the fact that I quoted the numbers of stores from wikipedia is hardly a way to critisize me. Would it be any diffrent is I would have said, one out of 1,000 stores or made up a number? I'm hardly going to try to research the exact number of target stores when you and I both know very well that there are many, many, many target stores. Quoting a number puts the insignificance into perspective and granted it might be more than 1 but even if its 20 stores out of 1000 its still .2%...
As for your "ENTIRELY BIASED" wikipedia comment... who is really biased on how many target stores are there? a.k.a Who cares?
LAME? yes, your response surely is. Take a logic course before you try to attack another argument.