this is VERY interesting... the Sony S series (budget) *passes* 3:2 pulldown HQV test, yet the more expensive W model fails... curious if the V passes or not.
More interesting is that the samsung xx61 passes (an older model) and has 1050 static res while the sony's W has only 850 lines??
Granted the samsung 61 series couldnt beat the newer sony's black level (i suppose the 10 bit panel is supposed to help) but it is much cheaper, along with the S series... than the W.
Following the commercial success (and technical disappointment) of the original Wildfire -- which featured a miserly 528MHz CPU and QVGA display -- HTC has returned with the Wildfire S.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
this is VERY interesting... the Sony S series (budget) *passes* 3:2 pulldown HQV test, yet the more expensive W model fails... curious if the V passes or not.
More interesting is that the samsung xx61 passes (an older model) and has 1050 static res while the sony's W has only 850 lines??
Granted the samsung 61 series couldnt beat the newer sony's black level (i suppose the 10 bit panel is supposed to help) but it is much cheaper, along with the S series... than the W.
Curious how the V-series would test.